Intel SSD running at 3.0gb/s instead 6.0gb/s?

ArkAngel06

Distinguished
May 19, 2009
42
0
18,530
Hi guys, i just slapped my new computer together, and all went well, but I noticed after the POST screen displays, it lists my X25-M Intel SSD's speed at 3.0gb/s instead of 6.0...i know I installed it in the right sata socket, its a gray one and the mobo manual says those are the 6.0gb/s sockets. And I used the special 6gb/s cable that came with my mobo.

The motherboard is an ASUS P6X58D-E. Is there a setting in the bios or something? I did look through it quite a bit.

Thanks
 

gtvr

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2009
1,166
0
19,460
I don't know if there's a quick answer to that. In one sense, a good (like the intel) SSD will almost always be faster than a 10K drive. How much do you benefit from that, depends on your machine/workload. Windows boot, app launch could benefit, games might not.

Then, throw in cost per MB, different things you could do (RAID 0 of 7200 rpm drives, raid of 10K drives, mix SSD boot with std storage) and it's a lot to think about.

newegg has the velociraptor 600GB for 279: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136555&Tpk=velociraptor%20600gb. The x25M 160gb (upcoming version?) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167019&cm_re=x25-m-_-20-167-019-_-Product is $449. A pair of 750gb WD black, 7200 rpm drives in raid 0 would run probably under $150.
 
The reason you buy a 10,000rpm drive is because it has a faster access time than a 7200rpm drive. The 10,000rpm drive might improve the access time by a factor of 2 or so.

An SSD improves access time by a factor of around 100 times.

So yes, for access times one SSD is much better than a 10,000rpm drive.