When you use overclock scores to claim how much better an E4300 is over an X2 4600+ at stock, that's cherrypicking. Let's look at the stock performance. Overall, the E4300 wins hands down only in power draw.
3DS Max 8:
4600+ gets 2.84; E4300 gets 2.74; Intel wins by a small margin.
Divx encoding:
4600+ 108 seconds, E4300 101; Intel wins by 7 seconds
Windows Media Encoder:
4600+ 85 seconds, E4300 96 seconds; AMD wins by 11 seconds
Itunes:
4600+ 48 seconds, E4300 47 seconds; Intel wins by 1 second
Quake 4:
4600+ 130.7 fps, E4300+ 114.4 fps; AMD wins, but who can notice the difference while actually playing?
Oblivion:
4600+ 76.5 fps, E4300 72.5, a tie in my book because I've played every TES game since Arena and they are not designed to get FPS framerates, so any high end GPU setup with either CPU is a first class choice without overclocking.
Half Life 2:
4600+ 134.2, E4300 127.1; AMD wins but who cares about 7 fps? They're in the same league in this game.
Total System Power at Idle:
4600+ 157 watts, E4300 at stock 142.
Intel wins because it's a generation past the X2 series. Like I said, Intel learned from AMD. Had they not you'd still be defending Pentium D Presslers with watercooling at 4 gigahertz overclocked.
Power Consumption under Load:
4600+ 207, E4300 at stock 171. The new Intel generation wins again.
Not everyone overclocks, not everyone gets the same results and not everyone continues to experience a problem free overclock. When I tried to overclock a P4 Northwood years ago, it was a bust and I went back to stock. I'm sure Intel engineers learned from AMD that tweaking their design to please enthusiast overclockers leads to better benchmarks, which leads to an erosion in AMD sales. That's valid capitalist competition and I commend them on it.
It's not the Intel engineers that tick me off, it's the Intel suits and lawyers, but then again, I take the same attitude towards those types that the Hitchhiker's series did. Take all the corporate lawyers, 3/4 of the corporate suits, 1/2 of the marketing departments and send them off into space to colonize a backward planet so the people who really make the world work can do so without the sort of ridiculous interference that stifles innovation and scientific inquiry.
As I said, Intel for performance, AMD for bargain.
The E4300 Allendale is $117 right now at Newegg, the X2 4600+ Windsor is $113. This takes into account Intel's price drops, which makes it a better deal.
Overall, there are better budget boards for AMD and the budget boards for Intel that I keep seeing at Fry's use DDR2 533, whereas I can use either DDR2 667 or 800 in my current Nvidia board. With more price drops, Intel will get even better.
Maybe you will get your wish and AMD will die, then we'll see where Intel prices are a year later when there's no CPU competition. Penryn will be out much sooner than Agena, so that could very well happen.
3ball, I don't know how old you are or how long you've been building PCs, but I started with the 386SX-40 from AMD. CPUs were soldered on to the motherboard back then and when you upgraded, you upgraded both at the same time. It wasn't till I got a Cyrix 486-DLC 40, which fit on a 386 motherboard, that I bought both separately.
Though all CPU prices were higher back then, Intel was much higher. They had the corporate market and AMD went for the budget market. Even then, the Cyrix CPU I had for a year was cheaper than AMD, and much cheaper than Intel.
It might crack you up, but I hate monopolies as a matter of choice. No one is going to step into the CPU market if AMD goes under and I simply don't understand the tolerance you guys have for Intel's restrictive rebate mishegoss. Nvidia denies they'll ever step into the CPU market, nor will IBM take on Intel without AMD as a partner.
Intel today is where Microsoft was fifteen years ago. Microsoft didn't win in their market by being strong, they won by getting away with slaps on the wrist. If I had another OS for a gaming PC, I would not choose Microsoft. I used DR Dos and then OS 2 for years, only going to Win 98, then Win XP, only when I had to. Now, I'm at Vista solely for DX10 games.
You guys make the perfect prey for the corporate sharks. I guess it's because someday you hope you'll be one of the strong? Well, the corporate world is full of cheap Indian programmers in a world that is flat, pensions are gone and contract labor in IT is the norm. It can only get worse when whole industries are dominated by one company.
I've made my peace that I'm living in a 21st century mirror of the early 20th century, but I hope that a balance is brought to society and the business world by the time my son's close to retirement, I think it will take that long.