Intel's GN40 for Atom Does 1080P, But Not Blu-ray

[Marcus Yam]

The Intel Atom isn’t a powerhouse processor – this we know and accept. But its multimedia capabilities could be helped with video acceleration, which is where Nvidia hopes to jump in with its Ion chipset. But not so fast, says Intel!

Intel's GN40 for Atom Does 1080P, But Not Blu-ray : Read more

 

[gwolfman]

Which codecs are accelerated?

 

[jacobdrj]

BluRay is a lot closer to what I felt DVDs should have been in the 1st place. They are still to bulky, and way to delicate. Flash memory is the way to go, and many 'netbooks' have multiple SD card readers, USB ports, and the like. All they need are 10" screens with HD resolution, and you have yourself a better media device than any that existed before (including possible OTA reception, WIFI, etc). If Atom can be boosted to be able to do these things, AWESOME. Just make sure it doesn't make the netbooks so expensive as to not be worth it.

 

[SneakySnake]

cough *nvidia ion kicks ass* cough

 

[Tekkamanraiden]

[citation][nom]jacobdrj[/nom]BluRay is a lot closer to what I felt DVDs should have been in the 1st place. They are still to bulky, and way to delicate. Flash memory is the way to go, and many 'netbooks' have multiple SD card readers, USB ports, and the like. All they need are 10" screens with HD resolution, and you have yourself a better media device than any that existed before (including possible OTA reception, WIFI, etc). If Atom can be boosted to be able to do these things, AWESOME. Just make sure it doesn't make the netbooks so expensive as to not be worth it.[/citation]

Alright you are aware that DVD was originally released in 1995 and took until 2002 to become mostly main stream.

 

[Blessedman]

hehe 10" with HD, do you know what kind of expense that would be to have an LCD with a DPI that high?

 

[megamanx00]

Soooo... this GN40 is still crappier than ATI 3000 series or NVIDIA 9000 series integrated graphics which have both been out for some time now. Yeah, big surprise. If you want HD with an Atom you have to go with the NVIDIA ION platform. If Intel succeeds in locking them out, as they are currently trying to do in court, leaving vendors with an Intel only option on the ION, then you may start seeing VIA CPUs with future ION setups.

 

[megamanx00]

* Intel only option on the ION

I meant Intel only option on the Atom

 

[jacobdrj]

[citation][nom]Tekkamanraiden[/nom]Alright you are aware that DVD was originally released in 1995 and took until 2002 to become mostly main stream.[/citation]
Yes. I was dissapointed then, as LaserDisk was superior in quality, and VHS didn't have as many compatibility and duribility issues at that point. Since DVD was never intended to be portable, they should have just gone for a bigger form factor. I don't mean to suggest VHS was perfect, but to this day, I avoid DVDs because of their poor visual quality an sensitivity. Digital copies on flash drives are far more palpable.
BluRay is the 1st device where I can acualy not detect pixilation easily (other than analouge). Pixilation bothers me more than blurryness.
DVDs as a storage medium is also bad. Even with so calle 'high quality' meda, the disks produced at home are rarely compatible universally and often corrupt after a short time. Flash drives write more quickly, with more stability. VHS was more stable than DVD-R/RW/+R/RAM etc... DVDs are far more volitile than even CD-R's, which have a much better shelf life.
DVDs are a technological failure, and one I am glad we are moving away from. It has caused me little but frustration since it came out.

 

[jacobdrj]

[citation][nom]Blessedman[/nom]hehe 10" with HD, do you know what kind of expense that would be to have an LCD
with a DPI that high?[/citation]
You would think it is unreasonable, but with OLED, I could see it hapening. I would be happy if they would go to 1024x800, as 600 is just about 150 pixels too short to have 2 pages of MS Word side by side.

 

[pharge]

Watching 1080p on a 8-10" LCD sounds crazy to me (It will be hard for us to tell the difference between 1080p and 720p on an 8-10" LCD). However having the ability to output 1080p to our TV or LCD monitor with our netbook/nettop sounds very tempting.

 

[idisarmu]

[citation][nom]jacobdrj[/nom]You would think it is unreasonable, but with OLED, I could see it hapening. I would be happy if they would go to 1024x800, as 600 is just about 150 pixels too short to have 2 pages of MS Word side by side.[/citation]

...except that OLED is super expensive...

Price is important in netbooks... I don't think a netbook over $800 would sell very well.

 

[jacobdrj]

BluRay isn't exactly cheap either; we are kind of arguing apple vs. peach pie in the sky...

 

[SAL-e]

The CN40 can't play Blu-ray! We know that, but Ion can't play it either. There was article on AnandTech, but Nvidia requested to be removed, until they can verify the test. http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=581
The problem is not really the Nvidia chip set, but the DRM. Atom can't provide fast enough decryption in order to supply constant stream of data to the graphics chipset. If only the MPAA get their brains out of their a**es and remove DRM we might enjoy Blu-ray play back on small systems like ION and other Atom or ARM based.