Intel's Jim Keller abruptly left the company for unspecified personal reasons.
Intel's Jim Keller Resigns, Will Assist With Transition : Read more
Intel's Jim Keller Resigns, Will Assist With Transition : Read more
I'm sure Jim Keller will always have a seat at AMD =D.
He only needs to ask Lisa Su nicely and he'll be welcomed back with open arms.
Yeah that may be true...though my guess is Intel made him sign a non-compete agreement. Won't last forever sure but I'd wager it is in effect for at least a couple years or more. So we won't see that move likely happen anytime soon.
Why would you even think that?!?Last I checked, non-compete agreements are not legally binding.
That said I do hope he's okay physically/mentally. He always had an uncanny ability to look at requirements data and figure out the best architectures to solve those problems. It's not so much thinking up new solutions as it is balancing your existing silicon to get the most overall performance for the next couple years. For example: Would a 10% AVX IPC improvement makes sense if it take 30% more silicon, 40% more power when only 2% of instructions use it?
I have read papers about how certain people at Intel have a tendency to push you out if you don't play ball.
Either way it doesn't matter. This will be a loss for Intel no matter which way it unfolds. I bet their stock will take a hit today.
Keller is known as a leader of transformational efforts, and his depth of experience designing heterogeneous architectures played well to Intel's move towards multi-chip processor designs. In tandem with Raja Keller and Murthy Renduchintala, Keller was responsible for designing and aligning Intel's silicon portfolio under a new six pillar strategy that plays to the strengths of the company's IP.
Keller is known for relatively short stints at companies, typically leading turnaround efforts for roughly two years before moving on to other challenges. He served as Intel's senior vice president in the Technology, Systems Architecture and Client Group (TSCG) and general manager of the Silicon Engineering Group (SEG),
Yeah but other companies are going to think really hard about hiring you if it gets out that you do stuff like that.Last I checked, non-compete agreements are not legally binding.
Why would you even think that?!?
Yeah but other companies are going to think really hard about hiring you if it gets out that you do stuff like that.
Last I checked, non-compete agreements are not legally binding.
That said I do hope he's okay physically/mentally. He always had an uncanny ability to look at requirements data and figure out the best architectures to solve those problems. It's not so much thinking up new solutions as it is balancing your existing silicon to get the most overall performance for the next couple years. For example: Would a 10% AVX IPC improvement makes sense if it take 30% more silicon, 40% more power when only 2% of instructions use it?
I have read papers about how certain people at Intel have a tendency to push you out if you don't play ball.
Either way it doesn't matter. This will be a loss for Intel no matter which way it unfolds. I bet their stock will take a hit today.
In the US....non compete agreements are legally binding as long as their duration and terms are not excessive. States vary but that is the general gist of them. Source below
Non-Compete Agreement Law | USA Employment Lawyers
Our Rockford, IL non-compete agreement attorneys can help you make sure you fully understand your rights before signing an agreement. Call us today!www.usaemploymentlawyers.com
Yes. Some states yes some no. But i remember the cali case where it was shot down.Doesn't this only apply to California?
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/stock-price-historyWhy would I think "they would suffer"? Look at what happened when Steve Jobs left. And Job was just a brilliant marketer, not an engineer.
Keller left AMD before ZEN 1 even released,keller left intel after the CPU he put together for them released,what's your point here?Keller is considered a very valuable chess piece to have on your board. His career is a testament as such.
Because transformations aren't a one and done. Zen 2 had a lot of architectural changes over Zen 1. Zen 3 will have even more with a unified cache and IPC improvements. You have to aggressively keep at it.
That's the long term trend you cited on stock price. The key to Intel's long term health is if they actually keep the momentum going that he created. No one can say if that will happen. Hence there will be some doubt. Intel is not really seeing huge improvements yet because 10nm isn't offering them the power saving /speed they need, and 14nm obviously is at a dead end. Intel needs to go well beyond Sunny Cove and their current process nodes to retake the crown undisputed.https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/stock-price-history
Their stock went from $50 to $350?!?!
Keller left AMD before ZEN 1 even released,keller left intel after the CPU he put together for them released,what's your point here?
What CPU has Intel released that Jim Keller played a roll in developing? He was there for only 2 years. Anything he was involved with in the early stages should still be in the development pipeline.Keller left AMD before ZEN 1 even released,keller left intel after the CPU he put together for them released,what's your point here?