News Intel's upcoming CPU models confirmed by diagnostic tool — Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake SKUs revealed

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
These are by no means the only Arrow Lake-S processors we can expect from Intel; more models will inevitably come at launch, including low-powered variants and possibly Core Ultra 3 models (unless Intel refreshes the entry-level segment with Raptor Lake Refresh SKUs.
Click to expand...

Yes, for the entry-level Core i3 models, they will most likely use the "Raptor Lake" or even 'Meteor Lake' silicon instead. There is a high chance Intel would go this route.

But then Intel will have to drop the ULTRA moniker for differentiation. The Core 3 parts if planned by Intel will use a simple nomenclature like "Core 3 23X" series.

There won't be any "Ultra" codename here.

Based on previous data I have, the entire "Arrow Lake-S" lineup in total should include 13 models, including the 125W "unlocked" K-Series, 65W "non-K" and 35W "T" SKUs.

Apart from three "K" series chips, the lineup will include 5 non-K chips rated at the 65W (PL1) TDP, and 5 chips featuring a TDP of 35W (PL1).

3 K chips.
5 non-K chips.
5 T chips.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: thisisaname
" Lunar Lake is Intel's next-generation mobile CPU architecture featuring up to 68% higher IPC on the E-cores and 14% higher IPC on the P-cores than Meteor Lake."

So how, if anything, does this translate to how Arrow Lakes uplift will be compared to Raptor Lake.
I mean Meteor Lake was a Ultra Mobile platform, right?
Can the "up to 68%" higher IPC on the E-cores really be translated to a similar gain for the e-cores on Raptor Lake to Arrow Lakes e-cores?
 
The SKU numbering is interesting, on desktop it seems like ending with a SKU of 5 is mean more for "gaming"? I know the Intel docs say the K suffix denotes that too, but looking at the x5 SKU it seems to line up with what would have been considered a gaming worthy CPU in the past.

Lunar Lake is a little harder to tell (68 vs 66 for example).
 
in_the_loop said:
Can the "up to 68%" higher IPC on the E-cores really be translated to a similar gain for the e-cores on Raptor Lake to Arrow Lakes e-cores?
Click to expand...

Can't say with surety, but I doubt we might be getting a similar gain in IPC with Arrow Lake E-core arch as well, at least on the Arrow Lake-S desktop processor lineup.

The desktop CPU architecture is going to be different than what Intel has used on its Lunar Lake Mobile SoC lineup. Lunar Lake focused on a more power optimized E-core architecture, since these were the target for low power mobile devices.

But for the Arrow Lake-U, -H, -HX parts it might be a different story. I mean the Arrow Lake-HX (high-end notebook), Arrow Lake-H (performance notebook) and Arrow Lake-U (for thin and light notebooks) series of processors.
 
Meanwhile Dual-core CPUs are still alive and kicking, coming from the "Raptor Lake" lineup. Intel 310 spotted.

Appears to be a direct successor to the Intel Processor 300.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/u...0-6m-cache-up-to-3-90-ghz/specifications.html


Two P-Cores and 4 threads, but with a slightly faster clock speed. Roughly around 4.1 GHz.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6867189


Cu3qQMe.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JamesJones44 said:
Lunar Lake is a little harder to tell (68 vs 66 for example).
Click to expand...

The last digit/number most likely signifies the amount of on-package memory/DRAM the chip sports, IMO.

Since all Lunar Lake processors feature memory on package, the last digit of their SKU number directly relates to the amount of memory each processor is having, which would be 6 for 16GB and 8 for 32GB.

For example, 288V sports 32GB dual rank memory.
228V will again have 32GB.
266V has 16GB 1R MoP and so on.

pZJrvKQ.png



By the way, Some chips are still MIA. The recently spotted 234V SKU is missing, for example. Another model, 254V is also missing from the list.

There are more, so this lineup isn't complete. Intel Core Ultra 5 234V "Lunar Lake" CPU (16GB variant):

j3AxoHt.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechyIT223, thestryker and JamesJones44
Metal Messiah. said:
Meanwhile Dual-core CPUs are still alive and kicking, coming from the "Raptor Lake" lineup. Intel 310 spotted.

Appears to be a direct successor to the Intel Processor 300.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/u...0-6m-cache-up-to-3-90-ghz/specifications.html


Two P-Cores based on the Raptor Cove core architecture and 4 threads, but with a slightly faster clock speed. Roughly around 4.1 GHz.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6867189


Cu3qQMe.png
Click to expand...

Doesn't surprise me to see dual core SKUs still getting support and makeover from Intel.
 
Metal Messiah. said:
The last digit/number most likely signifies the amount of on-package memory/DRAM the chip sports, IMO.

Since all Lunar Lake processors feature memory on package, the last digit of their SKU number directly relates to the amount of memory each processor is having, which would be 6 for 16GB and 8 for 32GB.

For example, 288V sports 32GB dual rank memory.
228V will again have 32GB.
266V has 16GB 1R MoP and so on.

pZJrvKQ.png



By the way, Some chips are still MIA. The recently spotted 234V SKU is missing, for example. Another model, 254V is also missing from the list.

There are more, so this lineup isn't complete. Intel Core Ultra 5 234V "Lunar Lake" CPU (16GB variant):

j3AxoHt.jpeg
Click to expand...
Nice find! Thanks for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechyIT223 and Deleted member 2731765
Wow, I just updated to this latest version of CPU-Z and it bugged out on some of the entries. The mainboard and the memory TAB entries were blank. Had to completely uninstall, and then reinstall the app.

Previously, a direct update was always working from the get-go though. IDK, could be an isolated case as well. Checking it again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Metal Messiah. said:
By the way, Some chips are still MIA. The recently spotted 234V SKU is missing, for example. Another model, 254V is also missing from the list.

There are more, so this lineup isn't complete. Intel Core Ultra 5 234V "Lunar Lake" CPU (16GB variant):

j3AxoHt.jpeg
Click to expand...

I'm guessing these variants ending in 4 might be lower end entry level parts, having even lower TDP for mobile devices.

I wouldn't be surprised if the XE2 igpu also has some cores shaved off the chip.
 
IMO, Most likely an adjustment to the TDP and number of Xe2 cores, and other I/O or display capabilities if possible with the die.
 
TechyIT223 said:
I'm guessing these variants ending in 4 might be lower end entry level parts, having even lower TDP for mobile devices.

I wouldn't be surprised if the XE2 igpu also has some cores shaved off the chip.
Click to expand...

They could be lower end parts, but we can't say this with surety. The core count is obviously the same, 4+4, 8 cores in total, as well as the memory amount listed in the patch notes which is 16 GB.

So what would really make these parts separate from the rest of the lineup remains to be seen.

Most likely an adjustment to the TDP and number of Xe2 cores, and other I/O or display capabilities if possible with the die.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechyIT223
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom