I was reading other threads, in other forums on this site, so I wouldn't have to ask questions that were already answered, and I came across a critique of someone's prospective build for a "really good gaming computer".
He had an i9-14900 on his list. Someone responded that they wouldn't recommend the 14900 for gaming, and suggested the Intel Core i7-14700F 2.1 GHz 20-Core Processor instead.
My question is, does the CPU Thread Community here agree? More importantly, can you explain why? I just assumed, newer, faster, better...?
I don't want something that's just good enough now. I want something that will be plenty good enough for at least a few years.
My prospective build, and what I'm using it for below:
CPU: Intel - Core i9-14900K Raptor Lake 3.2GHz Twenty Four-Core LGA 1700
CPU cooler: Noctua - NH-D15S Chromax Black
Motherboard: Gigabyte - Z790 AORUS Elite X WiFi 7 Intel LGA 1700 ATX
Ram: Corsair - Vengeance 64GB (2 x 32GB) DDR5-6000 PC5-48000 CL30 Dual Channel
SSD/HDD: Crucial - T705 2TB Micron 232L TLC NAND PCIe Gen 5 x4 NVMe M.2 Internal SSD
GPU: Gigabyte - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super Windforce V2 Triple Fan 16GB GDDR6X PCIe 4.0
PSU: Lian Li - Edge 850 Watt 80 Plus Platinum ATX Fully Modular
Chassis: Lian Li - Lancool 216 Tempered Glass ATX Mid-Tower
OS: Microsoft - Windows 11 Home 64-Bit FPP USB
Monitor: MSI - MPG 321URX 32" 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) 240Hz Gaming Monitor
My goal with this build is to not have to worry about upgrading for awhile. 75% of the time I use my computer for very basic stuff (internet, editing travel videos and drone footage, microsoft office applications, etc...) The other 25% of the time would be for gaming. I'm not a professional or anything, but I would like to play at, or close to, the highest settings, and if something new comes out in the next year or two, I don't want to worry if my system can handle it. (I'm mostly into Fallout/Elder Scrolls/CIV type stuff, but co-workers want me to join them for some Fortnight/CoD)
He had an i9-14900 on his list. Someone responded that they wouldn't recommend the 14900 for gaming, and suggested the Intel Core i7-14700F 2.1 GHz 20-Core Processor instead.
My question is, does the CPU Thread Community here agree? More importantly, can you explain why? I just assumed, newer, faster, better...?
I don't want something that's just good enough now. I want something that will be plenty good enough for at least a few years.
My prospective build, and what I'm using it for below:
CPU: Intel - Core i9-14900K Raptor Lake 3.2GHz Twenty Four-Core LGA 1700
CPU cooler: Noctua - NH-D15S Chromax Black
Motherboard: Gigabyte - Z790 AORUS Elite X WiFi 7 Intel LGA 1700 ATX
Ram: Corsair - Vengeance 64GB (2 x 32GB) DDR5-6000 PC5-48000 CL30 Dual Channel
SSD/HDD: Crucial - T705 2TB Micron 232L TLC NAND PCIe Gen 5 x4 NVMe M.2 Internal SSD
GPU: Gigabyte - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super Windforce V2 Triple Fan 16GB GDDR6X PCIe 4.0
PSU: Lian Li - Edge 850 Watt 80 Plus Platinum ATX Fully Modular
Chassis: Lian Li - Lancool 216 Tempered Glass ATX Mid-Tower
OS: Microsoft - Windows 11 Home 64-Bit FPP USB
Monitor: MSI - MPG 321URX 32" 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) 240Hz Gaming Monitor
My goal with this build is to not have to worry about upgrading for awhile. 75% of the time I use my computer for very basic stuff (internet, editing travel videos and drone footage, microsoft office applications, etc...) The other 25% of the time would be for gaming. I'm not a professional or anything, but I would like to play at, or close to, the highest settings, and if something new comes out in the next year or two, I don't want to worry if my system can handle it. (I'm mostly into Fallout/Elder Scrolls/CIV type stuff, but co-workers want me to join them for some Fortnight/CoD)