Question Is it finally time to upgrade from the i5 2500k @4.7 GHz?

Badelhas

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2011
112
0
18,690
Best answers
2
I've been rocking the 2500k overclocked to 4.7ghz (a overclock champion!) for many years now, along with 8gb of DDR3 1600mhz, a nvidia 1070 and a 950 Evo SSD. I play some FPS games, with the HTC Vive or with my 1440p monitor, browse the web and watch some movies. Since the performance improvements on the CPUs launched since then have been small between each generation I've been delaying the decision to upgrade since I'm going to need new CPU, new motherboard and new RAM, which is a 500 euros investment, at least and memory prices were outrageous until now.
Did anyone here went from an overclocked 2500k to the AMD 2700x or to the Intel 9700k, for instance? Are there noticeable performance differences in real world usage?

I would love some input from someone who did a similar upgrade, please, because I don´t know if I should just wait for Ryzen 2, at this point.

Cheers :)
 

DSzymborski

Illustrious
Moderator
Nov 19, 2010
7,897
268
41,740
Best answers
1,179
Well, here's the key question: While these upgrades are significantly better, are you actually unhappy with the performance? I tend to recommend upgrades for people when they're at a point at which something is making them unhappy and the upgrade would change that something in a positive direction.
 

DSzymborski

Illustrious
Moderator
Nov 19, 2010
7,897
268
41,740
Best answers
1,179
if you had the i7, it'd be more marginal, with the i5 you're going to start to struggle on newer titles, parallelism can trump clockspeed sometimes.
Yeah, I was perversely a bit sad that my 3770k held up in my main rig so well that I didn't have a real excuse to update the platform to something newer. Then the USB and SATA controllers on the motherboard were starting to have problems and I finally had an excuse!

Now, the i7-3930K in my work rig continues to show a stubborn amount of life.
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
May 18, 2007
16,187
207
81,640
Best answers
2,361
Did anyone here went from an overclocked 2500k to the AMD 2700x or to the Intel 9700k, for instance? Are there noticeable performance differences in real world usage?
When you trade IPC and clocks for more cores and threads, the performance benefits you get are heavily dependent on how well-threaded the games and software you use are.

My rule of thumb for 'when to upgrade' is not until I feel like my computer is struggling with stuff it shouldn't be or in ways that are unacceptable that an upgrade should be able to resolve. My i5-3470 is starting to show its age in some places but still within what I would consider acceptable overall, so I'm still not in any hurry to spend $500+ on a new CPU-MoBo-RAM combo.
 

maziech

Upstanding
Feb 18, 2019
354
42
240
Best answers
13
It's not worth upgrading. You are still good on @4.7 2500k.
Most of the games won't use all cores of CPU, so what matters here is mostly single core speed.

If You use Your setup for gaming in 2k/4k You won't see noticable difference in most games.
Well, i mean THERE IS some difference, especially in the lowest 1% performance, but it is not worth spending 500EUR on it unless You expect top performance You can get.

If all You need is gaming pc and You want to see noticable difference, just buy 8gb extra Ram and replace your graphic's card with something faster (gtx 1070 is totally fine though).

Few days ago I just bought 1080 ti for my i7 2600k @4.4 Ghz / 16gbRam and trust me: IT IS FINE for 2k/4k gaming.
It will bottleneck CPU from time to time, but mostly at lower resolutions (like 1920x1080 and below).
The higher res You play on, the more graphic card becomes a deciding factor and a bottleneck.

Take a look at this video. I think it's the best answer for You:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dHCQOt5Nns
 

13thmonkey

Titan
Moderator
Jan 10, 2006
23,944
184
81,440
Best answers
2,155
It's not worth upgrading. You are still good on @4.7 2500k.
Most of the games won't use all cores of CPU, so what matters here is mostly single core speed.

If You use Your setup for gaming in 2k/4k You won't see noticable difference in most games.
Well, i mean THERE IS some difference, especially in the lowest 1% performance, but it is not worth spending 500EUR on it unless You expect top performance You can get.

If all You need is gaming pc and You want to see noticable difference, just buy 8gb extra Ram and replace your graphic's card with something faster (gtx 1070 is totally fine though).

Few days ago I just bought 1080 ti for my i7 2600k @4.4 Ghz / 16gbRam and trust me: IT IS FINE for 2k/4k gaming.
It will bottleneck CPU from time to time, but mostly at lower resolutions (like 1920x1080 and below).
The higher res You play on, the more graphic card becomes a deciding factor and a bottleneck.

Take a look at this video. I think it's the best answer for You:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dHCQOt5Nns
The extra 4 threads from the i7 make a massive difference compared to the i5.

The jump from 7600k to 8400, 4C4T @4.2 to 6C6T@ 4.0 is quite pronounced.

I suffered on 'The division' with only 4C4T, i'm sure if i had the 3770k i'd still be fine. The old i5's are not parallel enough any more, the mantra of single core performance is not enough, you also need parallelism.
 

maziech

Upstanding
Feb 18, 2019
354
42
240
Best answers
13
Umm..... Yeah?... MAYBE in SOME games that MIGHT be true.
But still, even if it is, You can just buy used 2600k or 2700k for about 100$, instead of replacing the entire setup, and then sell Your 2500k for 20$ ;-)

If it is only gaming, there's no point going AMD, and good Intel setup is quite expensive.
What i'm saying is that gains will be inadequate to cost.

New gaming setup like 9600k + good mobo + new ram + good cooling for OC is like 600+EUR. It's not worth it yet.
 

13thmonkey

Titan
Moderator
Jan 10, 2006
23,944
184
81,440
Best answers
2,155
Umm..... Yeah?... MAYBE in SOME games that MIGHT be true.
But still, even if it is, You can just buy used 2600k or 2700k for about 100$, instead of replacing the entire setup, and then sell Your 2500k for 20$ ;-)

If it is only gaming, there's no point going AMD, and good Intel setup is quite expensive.
What i'm saying is that gains will be inadequate to cost.

New gaming setup like 9600k + good mobo + new ram + good cooling for OC is like 600+EUR. It's not worth it yet.
I've only quoted BFV as I can't think of anything recent TBH, division 2 will have the same results, frankly anything multiplayer will have the same results. And these are all FPS's

I agree that an i7-2xxx or 3770k will do almost as well at a lot lower cost
 

maziech

Upstanding
Feb 18, 2019
354
42
240
Best answers
13
Yep, but if You look at the benchmarks from Your link, You should notice that in the case of GTX 1070 the graphics card is a bottleneck, not the CPU. 9900k and 2700x looks exactly the same with 1070.

Besides, the tests resolution was 1080p.
At 2k/4k gaming, I assume You wouldn't see much difference on any i5 or i7, even if it was the second gen of Intel.
 

Rodrigodrt

Reputable
Nov 21, 2014
320
5
4,915
Best answers
30
Yes and no. It's an old CPU and obsolete, probably will struggle a bit with modern games and all, but doesn't means it wont run if you can accept the fact that you'll have to tone down graphics a bit.

Then, what we have currently available, 8th gen wich is also obsolete but will certainly last a few years, then the 9th gen, a frankenstein chip, the refresh of the refresh, nothing wrong with it but its certainly a mash up together to keep up with the amd threat.

if possible, wait to see what intel will unveil for the 10th gen, maybe they will finally sort out the 10nm process wich is finally the first real architecture update since kaby lake.
 

ohiou_grad_2006

Splendid
Dec 3, 2011
3,571
8
24,215
Best answers
379
I would suggest if you are going to upgrade, hold off about 4 months or so. Ryzen 3000 series is rumored to be launching this summer around June or July. Some reports at CES were saying one of the 8 core 16 threaded parts were beating an i9.

Leaks are saying CPUs may get close to 5ghz stock. Of course those numbers aren't confirmed and are speculation, but it seems like if you can get 8 or more cores and get 5ghz or better, that should set you for a while.
 

maziech

Upstanding
Feb 18, 2019
354
42
240
Best answers
13
I would suggest if you are going to upgrade, hold off about 4 months or so. Ryzen 3000 series is rumored to be launching this summer around June or July. Some reports at CES were saying one of the 8 core 16 threaded parts were beating an i9.
Totally agree with that. Zen 2 chips might be a good value for money.
Besides, gtx 1070 is not 2080ti. Your processor will handle it well enough. Just buy 8gb of ram for about 40-50$ and You're good with this setup for next 2+ years on acceptable/good gaming quality.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS