Been trying to do some research and tailor my 10900k OC settings to those I've seen, but was looking for a second second opinion on my settings.
Running a 10900k @ 5.1ghz all cores.
Benchmarking using XTU runs all cores at max 1.39v. Max temp is 80c. Voltage is set to 1.35v with auto LLC in BIOS. Idle voltage is 1.35-1.37v.
After a little OC tweaking, 5.2ghz all cores crashes, so I dialed back to 5.1 ghz as I didn't want to push higher than 1.35v in BIOS. Since I was hitting 1.39v highs during benchmarking @ 5.1, I wanted to see if I could lower my voltage since I've read 1.3-1.35 is where it seems to be safe based off other forum discussions about it. Couldn't get my pc stable at 1.25v, or 1.3v in BIOS. It would boot up, but as soon as I tried opening XTU or MSI afterburner, it would BSOD and restart. So my settings are back to 5.1 with 1.35 in BIOS, but hitting 1.39v in XTU benchmark. Though my pc has been completely stable with these settings, is that 1.39 and 1.35-1.37 idle voltage too high? Can it damage my CPU if it stays this way?
Running a 10900k @ 5.1ghz all cores.
Benchmarking using XTU runs all cores at max 1.39v. Max temp is 80c. Voltage is set to 1.35v with auto LLC in BIOS. Idle voltage is 1.35-1.37v.
After a little OC tweaking, 5.2ghz all cores crashes, so I dialed back to 5.1 ghz as I didn't want to push higher than 1.35v in BIOS. Since I was hitting 1.39v highs during benchmarking @ 5.1, I wanted to see if I could lower my voltage since I've read 1.3-1.35 is where it seems to be safe based off other forum discussions about it. Couldn't get my pc stable at 1.25v, or 1.3v in BIOS. It would boot up, but as soon as I tried opening XTU or MSI afterburner, it would BSOD and restart. So my settings are back to 5.1 with 1.35 in BIOS, but hitting 1.39v in XTU benchmark. Though my pc has been completely stable with these settings, is that 1.39 and 1.35-1.37 idle voltage too high? Can it damage my CPU if it stays this way?