Is my CPU bottlenecking my GPU?

Shadowblade2652

Honorable
Nov 20, 2012
1,409
0
11,660
Hi all,
I recently upgraded my computer to the following specs:
CPU: AMD A8-5600k clocked at 3.8GHz (OC)
RAM: 4GB G.Skill 1600MHz
GPU: Nvidia GTX 660TI SE (EVGA) 2GB GDDR5
OS: Windows 8.1

I have a problem running certain games. I can max out games like Borderlands 2 and still get respectable framerates, as well as Battlefield 3. I cannot, however run BF4 smoothly on low-medium settings because the game is very very stuttery. I will have 40FPS one moment and next I'll have around 5 - 10. It's very annoying and I have no clue how to fix it. Is the CPU the reason for the bottleneck, or does it have to do with RAM (I will get 2GB more soon so I'll have 6GB total)?

(Also as a side note, I run the games at 1600x900. I don't run them at 1080p.)
 


The BF4 system specs state a dual core as a minimum, so it should work perfectly with a 3.8Ghz quad core at low-medium. Besides, your CPU still has a respectable 4MB cache it should be enough.

Have you updated your GPU drivers? Both nVidia and ATI have new drivers optimized for BF4.

Edit: Also, you should really get 8 GBs of RAM, make sure they're in dual channel mode (in pairs, ex: 2x4GB), very important especially on AMD CPUs.
 


4gb is the bare minimum to play bf4, 8gb is what you want.

don't buy a 2gb stick, to run in proper dual channel you need another 4gb stick that is equal to what you currently have.
 

The problem is I currently have 2 2GB sticks. I only have 2 DIMM slots and I can't afford to buy 8GB, so I settled on 4GB more of this RAM + 1 of the 2GB sticks for 6GB, until later, when I can buy a second 4GB
 


Totally incorrect, there are literally hundreds of posts here that show bf4 stutters and suffers horribly with 4gb of ram.

 


Is it okay if I mix 2GB + 4GB in the same dual channel slots? they are the same brand and speed.

And,
Is 6GB enough for BF4? Or is that too little as well.
 


my quad Q9550 (probably stronger than the APU) stuttered on high density maps 64 TDM noshar for instance. upgraded to a 3570k and it all went buttery smooth. So all quad cores are not equal, and APU's are notoriously weak.
 


if you have an ivybridge mobo then a i5 3470k is possibly your best bet if you can afford it.
 


yes, but in order to pay off the money for an i5 I would have to sell more than my CPU and mobo 😉 an i3 will run me about the same price as my current CPU, but is it better? Or is it not worth spending that money?
 
keep saving. dual cores ain't worth it.......... don't care how good some people think they are.

an i5 would be the route with new board....$300.

or an amd 6300/8320/8350.................$2-300............

run what you have right now at the lower res.

wouldn't stop at $300 though. would plan on a card upgrade too.
 


If it doesn't make a difference then should I do it? If I do it now it will open up more upgradeability in the future, as well as more RAM slots because the ivyb motherboard has 4 DIMM slots as opposed to my 2