Is my cpu temp good?

Nov 12, 2017
10
0
510
I don't know much about temperatures but i heard i could test my cpu with prime95, and so i did. I ran the test for 40-50 mins and the max cpu temp i got was 54, is that good enough or should i run the test for longer? I have an amd ryzen 3 1200 non overclocked
 
Ryzen good temp is <85 during stress test
Stock setting should not cause any temp issue
Stop using prime95, too stessful for the components and some people claimed it damaged their pc, use realbench/aida64
Go easy on the voltage and always increase clock speed first before increase voltage. Good luck.
 

Zerk2012

Titan
Ambassador
Stop using prime95, too stessful for the components and some people claimed it damaged their pc.

Never heard of that and used it for a bunch of years and never had a problem. It puts a full load on the processor either your cooling is good enough or it is not. I guess you could burn your board if it can't handle the CPU load. If you had a cheap AM3 board rated for 125 watts and was trying to overclock a 125 watt processor and run the test I guess you could damage it but that is your fought not Prime95.
 

Rogue Leader

It's a trap!
Moderator


Your comments about Prime95 are hearsay. If it damaged components its because the components were either already failing, improperly cooled, or excessively overclocked. Theres no such thing as too stressful if your system is properly built, overclocked, and being monitored properly. Newbies shouldn't just "turn it up to 11" right away, but its perfectly fine for testing systems and overclocks.
 

Rogue Leader

It's a trap!
Moderator


CompuTronix is our resident expert. That specific issue is true, however its also specific to Intel processors (user has a Ryzen processor), that post is almost two years old and and that issue has already been addressed (hence newbies shouldn't just jump in and turn it up to 11) suffice to say you should properly understand software you are running before you run it. Both the FAQs on it and numerous posts on every computer site have instructions to use small FFTs in P95 to avoid this issue.

I run Prime95 torture tests on my Ryzen system all the time, with no ill effects nor excessive temperatures.
 
@ Rogue Leader

I actually ran prime 95/Aida/realbench all. Prime95 will cause temp 10 degree higher than the other two. New comers may not know what they are getting into. When I first OC, prime 95 was recommended and I did try it. You know I was very cautious, so I didn't fry my stuff. i actually hope prime95 has a thermal limit that can kick in so nobody needs to worry.
 

Rogue Leader

It's a trap!
Moderator


It does not have a thermal limit. Its made to torture test your system, it will failure test your system if your system will fail. Its a tool to be properly used, and you should read and understand what you are using before using it. It caused a temp 10 degress higher because it was pushing the CPU that much further, hence why it is the best, and most torturous.

As I said its a tool, kind of like a power drill. If you put in a screw to a piece of wood with a drill you can either use the clutch, or you need to stop at a certain point or you will dig the screw in too deep, crack the wood, etc. You can't expect torture test software to hold your hand. On top of that he ran Prime 95 and his temp was 54 degrees, indicating there was no problem whatsoever with the system or software. There is 0 chance of his system being damaged at 54c. If you're not confident using it thats fine, but don't pass along old and incorrect assumptions about how it works to try and prove your point.
 

CompuTronix

Intel Master
Moderator

vapour,

Respectfully, you appear to be misinformed. Don't feel singled out, as there's a tremendous amount of misinformation circulating around the Internet concerning this poorly understood topic.

The issue with Prime95 is strictly version dependent. We have a Sticky which explains this in detail; Intel Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-1800828/intel-temperature-guide.html

Please read the entire Guide very carefully, however, pay especially close attention to Sections 11 and 12.

For the record, there is nothing wrong with Prime95 version 26.6!

• Prime95 v26.6 - http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=15504

Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's is the best utility for thermal testing. I've been working on this topic for over 10 years to which I've devoted thousands of hours of research and hands on testing. I've evaluated every test utility available. Although there are many utilities better suited for stability testing, I've never found any other utility better suited than P95 v26.6 Small FFT's for thermal testing.

For everyone's benefit, here's some highlights from the Guide:


" ... Section 11 - Thermal Test Basics

When working with processor temperatures, taking a methodical approach is always recommended. One of the guiding principles for properly conducting a test, is that it's crucial to set up the same conditions and follow the same procedures every time. This minimizes variables so results will be consistent and repeatable.

Here's some reasons why users find processor temperatures so confusing:

Terminology and specifications
Abundance of misinformation
Inconsistent test procedures

Since Ambient temperature, hardware configurations and stress test software are major variables, in order to compare apples to apples it's important to be specific. “Load” or “full load” are misleading user terms that could mean anything. Gaming, applications, rendering, transcoding, virus scanning and web surfing are partial and fluctuating workloads with fluctuating temperatures, which aren’t well suited for testing thermal performance. Also, 100% CPU utilization seldom equals 100% workload or Thermal Design Power (TDP).

Intel tests their processors under carefully controlled conditions at 100% TDP. Prime95 version 26.6 Small FFT's is ideal for CPU thermal testing, because it's a steady 100% workload with steady Core temperatures that typically runs Core i variants with Hyperthreading and Core 2 processors within +/- a few % of TDP. No other utility so closely replicates Intel's proprietary test conditions. This is also the utility that Real Temp uses to test Core temperature sensors.

Note: Do not use Prime95 versions later than 26.6 on 2nd through 8th Generation i3, i5 or i7 CPU's, which all have AVX (Advanced Vector Extension) Instruction Sets. Prime95 versions later than 26.6 run AVX code on the CPU's Floating Point Unit (FPU) which causes unrealistic temperatures up to 20°C higher. The FPU test in the utility AIDA64 shows similar results.

AVX can be disabled in Prime95 versions later than 26.6 by inserting "CpuSupportsAVX=0" into the "local.txt" file in Prime95's folder. However, since Core temperatures will be the same as 26.6, it's easier to just use 26.6. AVX doesn't affect Core i 1st Generation, Core 2, Pentium or Celeron processors since they don't have AVX Instruction Sets.

Under proper test conditions, there are only three relevant values:

Ambient temperature
Core temperatures at steady 100% workload.
Core temperatures at dead idle.

Sections 12 and 13 will explain how to properly test your rig using standardized methods which minimize hardware, software and environmental variables. Follow the "Setup" in both Sections to replicate Intel's test conditions. Each 10 minute test will establish a valid thermal "baseline" at steady 100% workload and at dead idle.


Section 12 - Thermal Test 100% Workload

Note 1: Keep in mind that we're thermal testing only. Stability testing is not within the scope of this Guide, which assumes your rig is properly assembled, configured and stable. If you're overclocked, then a combination of stress tests, apps or games must be run to verify CPU stability.

If you’re overclocked and run AVX apps such as for rendering or transcoding, you may need to reduce Vcore and Core speed or upgrade your cooler and case fans so Core temperatures don’t reach 85°C. Many 6th, 7th and 8th Generation motherboards address the AVX problem by providing offset adjustments in BIOS. An offset of -2 or -3 (200 or 300 MHz) is usually sufficient. Asus RealBench runs a realistic AVX workload typically within +/- a few % of TDP, and is an excellent utility for testing overall system stability, whether you're overclocked or not.

• Asus RealBench - http://rog.asus.com/rog-pro/realbench-v2-leaderboard/

Prime95's default test, Blend, is a fluctuating workload for testing memory stability, and Large FFT's combines CPU and memory tests. As such, Blend and Large FFT's both have fluctuating workloads which aren’t well suited for CPU thermal testing.

Other stability tests such as Linpack and Intel Burn Test have cycles that peak at 120% workload, which again aren’t well suited for CPU thermal testing. The test utility OCCT runs elements of Linpack and Prime95, which will terminate the CPU tests at 85°C.

The "Charts" in SpeedFan span 13 minutes, and show how each test creates distinct thermal signatures.

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Blend, Linpack and Intel Burn Test.

Note the steady thermal signature of Small FFT's, which allows accurate measurements of Core temperatures. A steady 100% workload is crucial for thermal testing.

Shown above from left to right: Small FFT's, Intel Extreme Tuning Utility CPU Test, and AIDA64 CPU Test.

Intel Extreme Tuning Utility is also a fluctuating workload. Although AIDA64's CPU test is a steady workload, it's far below TDP, which is insufficient for thermal testing. All other AIDA64 CPU test combinations are fluctuating workloads, which again aren't well suited for thermal testing. Also, AIDA64 is not Freeware, so the Trial version expires. ... "

" ... Here's the operating range for Core temperature:

Core temperatures above 85°C aren't recommended.

Core temperatures increase and decrease with Ambient temperature.

Idle temperatures below 25°C are generally due to Ambient temperatures below 22°C. ... "

Please let me know if you have any questions.

CT :sol:
 
And I'll just add this bit, given to me by Computronix a long time ago, that explains things in very simple terms that anybody can understand. I use it often and it is just as applicable NOW as it was THEN.


I can think of several reasons why x264 encoding or AVX / AVX2 / FMA3 apps won't work as a unilateral metric for thermal testing.

(1) A steady-state workload gives steady-state temperatures; encoding does not.

(2) Simplicity in methodology; most users would find encoding apps unfamiliar and cumbersome to accomplish a simple task.

(3) Most users such as gamers never run any apps which use AVX / FMA, so adaptive or manual voltage aside, it makes no sense to downgrade your overclock to accommodate those loads and temps.

(4) Standardization; Prime95 has been around since 1996; many users are familiar with it.

For the minority of users who routinely run AVX / FMA apps, then P95 v28.5 can be useful tweaking BIOS for thermal and stability testing.

Regardless of architecture, Prime95 v26.6 works equally well across all platforms. Steady-state is the key. How can anyone extrapolate accurate Core temperatures from workloads that fluctuate like a bad day on the Stock Market?

I'm aware of 5 utilities with steady-state workloads. In order of load level they are:

(1) P95 v26.6 - Small FFT's
(2) HeavyLoad - Stress CPU
(3) FurMark - CPU Burner
(4) Intel Processor Diagnostic Tool - CPU Load
(5) AIDA64 - Tools - System Stability Test - Stress CPU

AIDA64's Stress CPU fails to load any overclocked / overvolted CPU to get anywhere near TDP, and is therefore useless, except for giving naive users a sense of false security because their temps are so low.

HeavyLoad is the closest alternative. Temps and watts are within 3% of Small FFT's.
 
No, we cannot. We are moderators and enthusiasts. We are not part of the editorial team. Two different sides of the fence. The editorial and review section is an entirely different beast than the forums. They have paid staff, while we are all volunteers. They are constrained by much more stringent guidelines, while we aren't as much, having a much freer hand at offering opinions and personal experience rather than only what an editor wants to see up front.

It's like this. Everything neat and tidy on one side, while the other is half hazard but offers more character. :)

borders+july+2014+051.JPG