IS this 120hz monitor any good?

[Whatisgoingonherethen]

So this is the cheapest 120hz monitor I have stumbled across and I think it can go to 144hz as well, correct me if I'm wrong. Here it is:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/BenQ-XL2411Z-24-inch-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B00HZF2JWA/ref=sr_1_1?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1404402335&sr=1-1&keywords=BenQ+XL2411Z
Just a brief explanation about picture quality and use for gaming will suffice

 

[iceclock]

120hz is only really good if your gonna play above 60fps and most games dont need to go above 60fps.

also 120hz is used for 3d glasses and 3d games.

if the monitors not 3d compatible and you dont watch 3d movies not even worth investing in.

only reason i could recommanda 120hz monitor is if you play competetive fps games and run over 100fps other than that i dont see a valid reason.

the human eye cant really notice beyond 60fps.

 

[bignastyid]

"the human eye cant really notice beyond 60fps." Thats a big load of BS. On a 60Hz monitor anything over 60 fps is a waste because you are only going to see 60 fps. As an owner of a 144hz monitor there is a noticeable difference between 60 fps and 120 fps

 

[iceclock]

no theres been test conducted that most humans cannot make the difference between 60 and 100fps.

 

[bignastyid]

no theres been test conducted that most humans cannot make the difference between 60 and 100fps.

Were they done by the onion?

 

[bystander]

120hz does help a fair bit, even if you don't reach 120 FPS. I'd say it is worth using when you reach 80 FPS, but even at 60 FPS it can provide a noticeable improvement. Having double or more refreshes, means you have less visible tearing and less latency. With V-sync, you have half as much time to wait for missed refresh times, resulting in smoother delivery when you are not pegged at your refresh rate, and if you are, it will still have less of the latency issue caused by that (FPS limiter needed for this result).

The human eye can see past 1000 FPS, though there is diminishing returns the higher you go. I personally find 80-90 FPS to be the sweet spot, but it isn't really the visible FPS that make 120hz great. It is the lower latency that is most noticeable. It is also important to realize that many tech's cause blurring, which reduces your ability to distinguish frames, while that monitor has tech to increase your ability to distinguish frames (Lightboost and fast pixel response times).

 

[iceclock]

funny. i know some humans can perceive more than 60fps but most dont care or need to see beyond the 60fps.

also most machines cant push beyond 100fps these days with max settings i only really see pro-gamers use a 120hz monitor.

i mean 120hz is a nice but not needed.

 

[bignastyid]

Here's a well written article and he even cited sources.
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/7199031187

 

[iceclock]

cool anyways ive had a 60hz led monitor for a few years and find it great i dont find the need to run games over 60fps.

if i did pro-gaming id invest in a 120hz monitor yes but only if i required it.

or maybe if i started watching 3d movies or games came out in full 3d glasses compatible.

 

[bignastyid]

cool anyways ive had a 60hz led monitor for a few years and find it great i dont find the need to run games over 60fps.

if i did pro-gaming id invest in a 120hz monitor yes but only if i required it.

or maybe if i started watching 3d movies or games came out in full 3d glasses compatible.

Have you ever played a game with a 120 or 144Hz monitor?

 

[bystander]

cool anyways ive had a 60hz led monitor for a few years and find it great i dont find the need to run games over 60fps.

if i did pro-gaming id invest in a 120hz monitor yes but only if i required it.

or maybe if i started watching 3d movies or games came out in full 3d glasses compatible.

Until you've gamed with one, you have no business telling us how it is without at least providing reviews on the topic.

As someone who uses a 120hz monitor, I can tell you there are noticeable differences. That said, I find the most impressive differences being the lowered latency and a more connected feel to the action. I also like 3D Vision (that monitor supports 3D Vision 2 with the kit).

 

[Whatisgoingonherethen]

no theres been test conducted that most humans cannot make the difference between 60 and 100fps.

You guys might find this interesting, it is evident people can tell the difference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2IF9ZPwgDM

 

[iceclock]

yes i have once its was good for quake3 and games i ran above 60fps but where i live the price difference between a 120hz monitor and 60 is 100$

 

[Whatisgoingonherethen]

Here's my system and you gus can tell me if 120hz is necessary:
GPU- R9 290 tri-x
CPU- i5 4670k
RAM- 2x4gb vengeance corsair low profile
MOBO- gigabyte z97-hd3
PSU- xfx 650w semi-modular bronze
HDD- 1tb caviar blue
SSD-120gb ocz vertex 2 (lol found it in my loft, might as well use it)
case- NZXT Phantom 410
So yeah, do you think it will reach 120hz on bf4 on high? I have seen that the r9 290 is capable of 90+ on ultra..

 

[iceclock]

u wont be hitting 120frames on bf4 no.

but i mean if ur buying a monitor today id suggest the 120hz model its just when i was purchasing a led monitor the 120hz were too expensive.

 

[bignastyid]

I would recommend a 120/144Hz monitor if you can afford it. I have the Asus VG248QE and love gaming on it. The BenQ XL2411Z is also a good monitor. Nice rig, just don't keep important data on that Vertex 2 drive they had a very high failure rate.

 

[bystander]

Here's my system and you gus can tell me if 120hz is necessary:
GPU- R9 290 tri-x
CPU- i5 4670k
RAM- 2x4gb vengeance corsair low profile
MOBO- gigabyte z97-hd3
PSU- xfx 650w semi-modular bronze
HDD- 1tb caviar blue
SSD-120gb ocz vertex 2 (lol found it in my loft, might as well use it)
case- NZXT Phantom 410
So yeah, do you think it will reach 120hz on bf4 on high? I have seen that the r9 290 is capable of 90+ on ultra..

Yes, you'll reach 120 FPS, but not 100% of the time. You'd definitely notice a difference with a 120hz/144hz monitor. I'd most definitely recommend it, especially considering that you'll likely keep the monitor longer than your existing PC. I usually use a monitor at least two PC lifetimes before replacement.

Nothing is necessary, but it would be a nice feature. The added smoothness and lowered latency reduced/eliminated my simulator sickness (like motion sickness), which I used to have problems with.

 

[bignastyid]

u wont be hitting 120frames on bf4 no.

but i mean if ur buying a monitor today id suggest the 120hz model its just when i was purchasing a led monitor the 120hz were too expensive.

You don't have to hit 120 or 144 FPS for it to be beneficial, even 80 looks better(smoother).

 

[iceclock]

i guess depends on budget i guess if he can afford the 144hz one or 120hz than its a no brainer.

btw only fools beleive the onion 😀

 

[bystander]

yes i have once its was good for quake3 and games i ran above 60fps but where i live the price difference between a 120hz monitor and 60 is 100$

So it was good for you. You only used it once and this debunks your earlier assessment that you can't see more than 60 FPS.

I don't see the big deal on spending $60-100 extra for something that will last you years.

 

[iceclock]

ya my assessments was not well explained, english is not my first language, i meant to say its not worth it for most to have 120hz but thats just my opinion, honestl if the 120hz was 40$ more i would of bought it but all depends of ur budget