yeah it's just fine. kingston is a fine, well trusted brand.
I dont really understand this whole megahertz and latency thing. If i divide 2400 mhz with cl12 i get 200, and if i divide for example 3000 mhz with 15 i get also 200. Does this mean a 30 euro more expensive hyperx savage that has 3000mhz and latency 15 will perform practically the same?
regardless of the numbers, the average person is not going to see a noticable difference in performance from higher ram speeds. capacity is much more important that speed and CAS latency/timings.
yeah it's just fine. kingston is a fine, well trusted brand.
I dont really understand this whole megahertz and latency thing. If i divide 2400 mhz with cl12 i get 200, and if i divide for example 3000 mhz with 15 i get also 200. Does this mean a 30 euro more expensive hyperx savage that has 3000mhz and latency 15 will perform practically the same?
yeah it's just fine. kingston is a fine, well trusted brand.
I dont really understand this whole megahertz and latency thing. If i divide 2400 mhz with cl12 i get 200, and if i divide for example 3000 mhz with 15 i get also 200. Does this mean a 30 euro more expensive hyperx savage that has 3000mhz and latency 15 will perform practically the same?
regardless of the numbers, the average person is not going to see a noticable difference in performance from higher ram speeds. capacity is much more important that speed and CAS latency/timings.
yeah it's just fine. kingston is a fine, well trusted brand.
I dont really understand this whole megahertz and latency thing. If i divide 2400 mhz with cl12 i get 200, and if i divide for example 3000 mhz with 15 i get also 200. Does this mean a 30 euro more expensive hyperx savage that has 3000mhz and latency 15 will perform practically the same?
regardless of the numbers, the average person is not going to see a noticable difference in performance from higher ram speeds. capacity is much more important that speed and CAS latency/timings.
ok, but just out of curiosity, does dividing the speed with latancy give an approximate number of performance?
yeah it's just fine. kingston is a fine, well trusted brand.
I dont really understand this whole megahertz and latency thing. If i divide 2400 mhz with cl12 i get 200, and if i divide for example 3000 mhz with 15 i get also 200. Does this mean a 30 euro more expensive hyperx savage that has 3000mhz and latency 15 will perform practically the same?
regardless of the numbers, the average person is not going to see a noticable difference in performance from higher ram speeds. capacity is much more important that speed and CAS latency/timings.
ok, but just out of curiosity, does dividing the speed with latancy give an approximate number of performance?