Hey there,
I just looked over this review, and it seems really strange to me.
they showing the CM 690 III, and its temperatures & noise level on working is really great, even by comparison to same level cases.
let's look over the Corsair 500r for example,
they're looking quite the same, with same cooling more or less, and by them, the CM better by 3 degrees, and by 8db(A).
Is this making sense?
Because I'm really considering buying this case after seeing this review.
Aren't they just bribed?
Here's the link for the review: uk.hardware.info/reviews/4872/cooler-master-cm-690-iii-review-bigger-and-better#/reviews/4872/6/cooler-master-cm-690-iii-review-bigger-and-better-test-results-cooling-400-watts
Thanks for your help.
I just looked over this review, and it seems really strange to me.
they showing the CM 690 III, and its temperatures & noise level on working is really great, even by comparison to same level cases.
let's look over the Corsair 500r for example,
they're looking quite the same, with same cooling more or less, and by them, the CM better by 3 degrees, and by 8db(A).
Is this making sense?
Because I'm really considering buying this case after seeing this review.
Aren't they just bribed?
Here's the link for the review: uk.hardware.info/reviews/4872/cooler-master-cm-690-iii-review-bigger-and-better#/reviews/4872/6/cooler-master-cm-690-iii-review-bigger-and-better-test-results-cooling-400-watts
Thanks for your help.