Itanium & Opteron histories

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

I found this to be an interesting article:

Itanium and Opteron Pit Power Against Compatibility | Battle rages for
64-bit processing dominance | February 17, 2005 | Network Computing
http://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml%3Bjsessionid=N5W4GVVE32XL0QSNDBGCKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleID=59301440

Yousuf Khan

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:41:01 -0500, Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@ezrs.com>
wrote:

>I found this to be an interesting article:
>
>Itanium and Opteron Pit Power Against Compatibility | Battle rages for
>64-bit processing dominance | February 17, 2005 | Network Computing
>http://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml%3Bjsessionid=N5W4GVVE32XL0QSNDBGCKH0CJUMEKJVN?articleID=59301440
>

The only thing I hadn't known is that Microsoft isn't going to support
Itanium for its cluster edition of Windows. I wonder who's actually
going to pay money for a cluster edition of Windows?

RM