EDIT: Link updated, so it will jump directly to the video benchmark.Giant said..
Core 2 Quad Q6600 frags FX-74 4x4 setup. Yes. One 2.4Ghz CPU from Intel frags two 3Ghz CPUs from AMD. 4x4 CPUs
Actually, in Video Encoding FX-74 frags intel QX6700
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2065499,00.asp
From the benchmark above,
QX6700 -> DIVX Video encoding = 100 seconds
However, if you want to encode more than one video for example 2 DIVX videos, therefore you will waste about 200 seconds
FX-74 -> DIVX Video encoding = 126 seconds
But, with AMD FX-74, you can perform multiple tasks at the same time.
So, you will get only 126~130 seconds to encode 2 DIVX videos at the same time
Conclusion,
In hardcore videos encoding benchmark, FX-74 is 37% faster compare to Intel QX6700.
Who the **** runs apache on windows.
In Matlab, Pro/Enginer, SolidWorks, and Apache web server benchmarks, the X2 6000+ frags the Intel QX6700 quad.
In file compression, audio encoding, the difference is around 5%. The only thing Intel qaud showed some real advantage is video encoding.
K10 will whip the crap out of Intel's double cheeseburger architecture.
Remember folks, you heard it here first! :lol:
I thought I was your favorite Doctor? :lol:But I like double cheeseburgers! :lol:
Damn, I swear half the posts on these forums are sarcastic remarks about our favourite Doctor. He's entrenched into our minds, arghhhh! :lol:
So AMD's 6.0 GHZ (2 X 3.0GHz), STILL kicks Intel's 10.64GHz (4 X 2.66GHz) in some tests.
It is actually the very tip of the graphs. I made the graphs in a really high tech program using eight 22" widescreen monitors, but I knew if I posted it at native resolution, your puny Intel machines couldnt handle the size and would crash. So I cropped it for ya.
Yes... those particular benches were singlethreaded, FPU heavy apps against a clock speed that is a deficit.... not an unexpected result. Though, as our good doctor typically does, picks the corn out of crap and generalizes it to a false conclusion.... no amount of pshycological treatment will help him.
Yes... those particular benches were singlethreaded, FPU heavy apps against a clock speed that is a deficit.... not an unexpected result. Though, as our good doctor typically does, picks the corn out of crap and generalizes it to a false conclusion.... no amount of pshycological treatment will help him.
I predict that 3D gaming will be 90% faster on AMD platform. The R600 is only optmized for AMD and that gives a 50% lead.
It is actually the very tip of the graphs. I made the graphs in a really high tech program using eight 22" widescreen monitors, but I knew if I posted it at native resolution, your puny Intel machines couldnt handle the size and would crash. So I cropped it for ya.