Kingston Unveils DDR4 SODIMM Memory For Intel Skylake Laptops

Status
Not open for further replies.

deksman

Distinguished
Aug 29, 2011
223
15
18,685
0
Timings are worse than on DDR3.
What's the point exactly on faster speeds and marginally lower voltage that won't ever be noticeable?
 

balister

Distinguished
Sep 6, 2006
403
0
18,790
2
Timings are worse than on DDR3.
What's the point exactly on faster speeds and marginally lower voltage that won't ever be noticeable?
Give DDR4 a little time to mature. If you remember when DDR3 original came out, it had latencies similar to the best DDR2 at the time. After a little maturity, DDR3 latencies dropped below DDR2 for similar speeds (DDR3 800 to DDR2 800 and DDR3 1066 to DDR2 1066).
 

beayn

Distinguished
Sep 17, 2009
947
0
18,990
1
Timings are worse than on DDR3.
What's the point exactly on faster speeds and marginally lower voltage that won't ever be noticeable?
If I remember right, when the clock speed goes up, the latencies look worse because they are measured in clock cycles not time. For example an 800mhz module with 4,4,4,5 would become a 1600mhz module at 8,8,8,10. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
 

cats_Paw

Distinguished
There has not been a real revolution in CPUs and RAM since the original quad cores (Intel Q6600).
WE have only had marginal upgrades, in many cases even sidegrades (anyone remmber those i5-2500K and i5-3XXXK comparison charts?).

Untill DX12 comes out full fleged and we can see real world performance, its impossibru to know if its even worth it upgradeing the oldest I-Cores.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY