Why compare low power mushroom computers to the best CPUs? This seems like a mismatch.
It's a shameless plug they always seem to do, especially in their articles about general tech. I guess they're hoping these sorts of articles draw in new readers who might not be aware of the site's resources on PC advice.
Wouldn't comparing mushroom to some ARM (perhaps Apple M1) along with some Ryzen GE CPUs and mobile Alder Lake and RISC-V make more sense?
I wouldn't compare them with conventional machines, at all. IMO, there are three interesting aspects/avenues of this research:
- To understand what communication, computation, and memory is occurring by these means, in the wild.
- As a tool to use, in bio-engineering.
- For composition of biodegradable computers usable in sensitive ecosystems or perhaps even medical implants.
Regarding the second point, there's a whole field of biology that's concerned with computational mechanisms. I think most of the work, to date, has focused on chemistry. The mycelium provides a very interesting avenue for exploring new computational mechanisms.
As for point #3, we might be talking kHz and not MHz. Think of very simple, low-tech purpose-built circuits. Not anything on the level of a general-purpose microcontroller.
Heh, ...mycocontroller.
; )