Latest 'Titanfall 2' News Reveals PC Requirements, Benchmarks, Visual Options

Status
Not open for further replies.

alextheblue

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2001
2,904
31
20,820
2


Since it was also built for the 8-core Jaguar AMD APU powered consoles, I'd bet it will run fine on a high-clocked AMD quad-core at the "recommended" config at the least. If the PC version is threaded as well as the console version, an 83xx would do well enough at higher settings. The lack of a DX12 render path is disappointing though. I can see having DX11 as the default but DX12 should be an option.
 

Decends

Respectable
Jul 3, 2016
685
0
2,060
48


My deduction is based on the fact for minimum settings it claims I3 6300T OR AMD Equivalent and the FX 8350 which is AMD's fastest most common CPU is about as fast as the I3 6100 which is only a little bit faster than the I3 6300T. Not to mention i suspect the PC version will not be that optimized given they were not willing to do a beta test of it on PC.
 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
2,344
0
19,960
50
BUT IS IT CRYSIS? take off hoser, this is the new touted benchmark! i could have said " but does it play titanfall2@4k@144hz over60FPS?"
oops i did it again.
too cliche'?
 

psiboy

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2007
178
0
18,690
3
If they had bothered to use DX12 the AMD Chips (fx-83xx) would have been in a better position as it uses more cores than dx11 (about 1.5 cores) Developer stupidity strikes again! I won't be buying this game...(Yes I enjoyed the first one) So many have moved to Windows 10 for DX12 and these numpties still only supporting DX11.
 

Gam3r01

Titan
Moderator


DX12 wasnt a thing when this game began development. They would have had to start over again to implement DX12 features (which realistically wouldnt have made a drastic impact) and possibly delayed the game a year or more.
 

psiboy

Distinguished
Jun 8, 2007
178
0
18,690
3


and yet a lot of recent titles have added dx12 support in patches....
 

hatib

Reputable
Jun 21, 2015
722
0
5,060
35
is a fx 8300@4.2 and gtx 960 4gb core clock@ 150mhz and memory clock@500mhz will be fine for playing at max setting no aa @108030fps
 

Decends

Respectable
Jul 3, 2016
685
0
2,060
48


Do able, but i don't think it would be enjoyable experience.
 

alidan

Splendid
Aug 5, 2009
5,303
0
25,780
0


Respawn Entertainment, a studio that thought 35gb for uncompressed audio was a good idea, i suspect developer incompetence FAR more then redoing the game for dx12/vulcan, i mean this is the same dev/people that refused private servers on pc, would not put an fov slider in the game, among other issues when they worked on cod
 

Decends

Respectable
Jul 3, 2016
685
0
2,060
48


I believe the uncompressed audio data is to be more CPU friendly.
 

alidan

Splendid
Aug 5, 2009
5,303
0
25,780
0


my computer is heavily crippled by mp3's, how they get them to work on deviced about the size if not smaller then my thumb is beyond me, not to mention formats that compress with higher quality and lower size then mp3,

I have a crappy cpu, ill take the insignificant performance hit that every other developer for... what, 10-20 years if not more has done and live with slight worse performance, and if running an mp3 cripples your engine, which again, brings up gross developer incompetence. more recent things they showed off/said about the game make me believe this is going to be doa anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS