Archived from groups: alt.games.thief-dark-project (
More info?)
"Jason L Tibbitts III" <tibbs@math.uh.edu> wrote in message
news:ufa64zonuan.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu...
>>>>>> "M" == Mos <Not@YourHouse> writes:
>
> M> I've read the CRTs are better for gaming than LCDs.
>
> Depends on how you define "better". I gave up CRTs a long time ago
> and certainly wouldn't give up the desk space and superlative image
> quality to go back to sitting in front of an X-ray machine.
>
> Where Thief is concerned, an LCD will actually go perfectly black
> while a CRT generally won't, so I'd say that they better reproduce the
> shadows that are so important. What many players find disorienting is
> the way objects leave trails on the screen. On a CRT, bright objects
> leave light trails, while on an LCD dark objects leave dark trails.
> Modern fast-response panels limit this effect. I personally play on a
> Samsung 191N or 191Tplus with a 25ms response time and I can't say
> that I see amy appreciable display artifacts that effect play.
>
> But perhaps I'm not as demanding as some.
Nope, gonna have to disagree with this.
CRTs render far better blacks than LCDs because a CRT's default state *is*
black - it's just a case of turning off the electron gun, leaving black
phosphor. With an LCD, its default state is fully lit (white) - the
backlight has to be masked by black pixels, so inevitably some of that light
leaks through, giving the washed-out grey look. I had a Dell 2001FP for a
while, and the backlight leakage was horrendous - it's probably better on
other panels (or at least I sincerely hope it is), but Thief looked
terrible, with absolutely no distinction between various depths of shadow.
I think I read somewhere that Sharp is developing an "inverse" LCD where the
default state is black like a CRT, but I can't find any info about it.
For general Windows use, LCDs are definitely better - DVI sees to that, but
for dark games like Thief, CRTs are, and probably always will be, superior.
Added to which, the whole dead/stuck pixel thing annoys me, with wretched
rules that favour the manufacturers over the consumer, e.g. "you can't
replace a panel if it has less than nine stuck pixels", so if you have
eight, you're screwed.
Here's an interesting article from Dan's Data on this subject:
http://www.dansdata.com/gz021.htm
*Desperately hopes that this doesn't descend into yet another "CRT vs. LCD"
flame war*