led or ips

[catsarecute]

Should I use a led or ips monitor I wanna do slot of gaming and I also want it to look good for watching YouTube web browsing stuff lime that I can't get tn currently my 2 monitor options are aoc g2460fq 24 inches. And aoc i2769vm so what should I get sorry for bad grammar and spelling typing on a tablet is a pain another option is also the Asus vs278q so I don't know what to get I have a beast computer but need a monitor which isn't crap and these r my only options because of reasons well thanks for reading and I hope I can find a good monitor if I have 60 hz monitor will imply be able to play games at more then 60 fps I really want a 144hz monitor because I have a nice computer with gtx 980 six core CPU 4.5 GHz so yah I do t want screen tearing

 

[Human Being]

Go for LED display unit because its energy saving and effecient.And also with crystal clarity of graphics display quality.For manufacturer,go with ASUS.

Cheers!

 

[Human Being]

Apparently IPS (Inplane Switching) technology is considered to be attached with LCD and so LED takes over LCD display.

 

[Suzuki@1473780084@1473780163]

IPS-LCD LED. LED is just the light used. Before LED we used CCFL. Modern monitors don't use a back light anymore either, we now put LED's on the top or bottom, and call it an edge lit LCD. IPS is just a type of LCD, there are three common types, IPS, MVA, TN.

 

[Human Being]

Yeah that's what I'm saying Suzuki.

 

[catsarecute]

Go for LED display unit because its energy saving and effecient.And also with crystal clarity of graphics display quality.For manufacturer,go with ASUS.

Cheers!

Yay so led is better for gaming and cleanses and response time great then I'm getting the led aoc one because 144hz also what is ips led

 

[catsarecute]

IPS-LCD LED. LED is just the light used. Before LED we used CCFL. Modern monitors don't use a back light anymore either, we now put LED's on the top or bottom, and call it an edge lit LCD. IPS is just a type of LCD, there are three common types, IPS, MVA, TN.

Dis confuses me so much so led worse and at the bottom?

 

[aylafan]

All modern LCD monitors are LED. It's just backlight technology used for LCD monitors. In simple terms... like a fluorescent light, a normal light bulb, LED lights, etc.

IPS is a type of panel (screen) used in LCD monitors. There is IPS, TN, MVA, PLS, etc. IPS vs TN panel is usually the most common comparison. IPS has better viewing angles, more accurate colors, etc. while TN usually has faster response times, can go up to 144Hz, etc. There are strengths and flaws with both panel technologies. Just Google the difference.

However, some IPS monitors came out recently that can go up to 144Hz, but they are very expensive like $700-1000 or more. Also, there is new technology called G-Sync or FreeSync which was designed for playing games which you can research online.

 

[catsarecute]

All modern LCD monitors are LED. It's just backlight technology used for LCD monitors. In simple terms... like a fluorescent light, a normal light bulb, LED lights, etc.

IPS is a type of panel (screen) used in LCD monitors. There is IPS, TN, MVA, PLS, etc. IPS vs TN panel is usually the most common comparison. IPS has better viewing angles, more accurate colors, etc. while TN usually has faster response times, can go up to 144Hz, etc. There are strengths and flaws with both panel technologies. Just Google the difference.

However, some IPS monitors came out recently that can go up to 144Hz, but they are very expensive like $700-1000 or more. Also, there is new technology called G-Sync or FreeSync which was designed for playing games which you can research online.

So which 1 is better

 

[catsarecute]

All modern LCD monitors are LED. It's just backlight technology used for LCD monitors. In simple terms... like a fluorescent light, a normal light bulb, LED lights, etc.

IPS is a type of panel (screen) used in LCD monitors. There is IPS, TN, MVA, PLS, etc. IPS vs TN panel is usually the most common comparison. IPS has better viewing angles, more accurate colors, etc. while TN usually has faster response times, can go up to 144Hz, etc. There are strengths and flaws with both panel technologies. Just Google the difference.

However, some IPS monitors came out recently that can go up to 144Hz, but they are very expensive like $700-1000 or more. Also, there is new technology called G-Sync or FreeSync which was designed for playing games which you can research online.

the s monitor I'm looking at has 144hz and 1 Ms respond time so is it better then tn ?

 

[aylafan]

If the LCD monitor description doesn't say IPS then it most likely a TN panel. Most 144Hz LCD monitors right now are TN panels.

 

[catsarecute]

If the LCD monitor description doesn't say IPS then it most likely a TN panel. Most 144Hz LCD monitors right now are TN panels.

Is the rog swift good?

 

[enteralt]

if you look for the best color go with IPS monitor
but if you look for gaming than you need to look for a monitor with high Response Time. no matter what it is.

 

[Suzuki@1473780084@1473780163]

The ROG Swift isn't even close to any average/decent IPS. But if you think you would need G-sync, then it's worth it. However, do note that simply a 144 Hz panel already minimizes our perception of screen tearing. I will tell you why, but I will use 120 Hz as an example, to make it easier to follow. 144 Hz is technically 1.4 ms faster than a 120 Hz panel.


A 60 Hz display refreshes every 16.67 ms, this is because 1 / 60 = 0.0166 (16.67) ms. This means that the monitor picks up the frame in the GPU's frame-buffer every 16.67 ms, meanwhile the GPU draws a frame in the back-buffer. It then copies the frame in the back-buffer to the frame-buffer as often as it can.

Okay, so we know that a 60 Hz display refreshes every 16.67, but why does it tear? That is because the monitor has a set refresh rate, and it picks up the frame from the frame-buffer, at the same time the back-buffer copies it's frame to the frame-buffer.

It's not the monitor that is half finished, it's the graphics card that is half finished and the monitor that is causing it. The monitor has a set refresh rate, again: 60 Hz = 16.67 ms. The graphics card does not.

V-sync, G-sync, FreeSync (if you use AMD graphics--you don't), will stop this from happening. However, by using a 120 Hz panel. What happens is that screen tearing occurs twice as much on a 120 Hz display, than on a 60 Hz--but why is the 120 Hz display better? That is because the difference between 2 frames, is going to be much smaller (faster). Simple math tells us that 1 / 120 = 0.0083 ms. That is indeed much lower (faster) than what a 60 Hz (16.67 ms) display is capable of. Provided you can push 120 FPS in games, though anything above 60 is gradually going to feel smoother and smoother, and minimize the screen tear up to 120 FPS.

This is because the frame that is tearing, spends half as much time as the 60 Hz display, on screen. The result is that it's very hard for us to actually notice the tearing, on a 120 Hz display, in comparison to a 60 Hz display.

 

[catsarecute]

The ROG Swift isn't even close to any average/decent IPS. But if you think you would need G-sync, then it's worth it. However, do note that simply a 144 Hz panel already minimizes our perception of screen tearing. I will tell you why, but I will use 120 Hz as an example, to make it easier to follow. 144 Hz is technically 1.4 ms faster than a 120 Hz panel.


A 60 Hz display refreshes every 16.67 ms, this is because 1 / 60 = 0.0166 (16.67) ms. This means that the monitor picks up the frame in the GPU's frame-buffer every 16.67 ms, meanwhile the GPU draws a frame in the back-buffer. It then copies the frame in the back-buffer to the frame-buffer as often as it can. So should I just get a 144hz monitor with 1ms respond time it would be very hard to notice screen tearing even at 240 fps in minecraft?

Okay, so we know that a 60 Hz display refreshes every 16.67, but why does it tear? That is because the monitor has a set refresh rate, and it picks up the frame from the frame-buffer, at the same time the back-buffer copies it's frame to the frame-buffer.

It's not the monitor that is half finished, it's the graphics card that is half finished and the monitor that is causing it. The monitor has a set refresh rate, again: 60 Hz = 16.67 ms. The graphics card does not.

V-sync, G-sync, FreeSync (if you use AMD graphics--you don't), will stop this from happening. However, by using a 120 Hz panel. What happens is that screen tearing occurs twice as much on a 120 Hz display, than on a 60 Hz--but why is the 120 Hz display better? That is because the difference between 2 frames, is going to be much smaller (faster). Simple math tells us that 1 / 120 = 0.0083 ms. That is indeed much lower (faster) than what a 60 Hz (16.67 ms) display is capable of. Provided you can push 120 FPS in games, though anything above 60 is gradually going to feel smoother and smoother, and minimize the screen tear up to 120 FPS.

This is because the frame that is tearing, spends half as much time as the 60 Hz display, on screen. The result is that it's very hard for us to actually notice the tearing, on a 120 Hz display, in comparison to a 60 Hz display.

 

[catsarecute]

The ROG Swift isn't even close to any average/decent IPS. But if you think you would need G-sync, then it's worth it. However, do note that simply a 144 Hz panel already minimizes our perception of screen tearing. I will tell you why, but I will use 120 Hz as an example, to make it easier to follow. 144 Hz is technically 1.4 ms faster than a 120 Hz panel.


A 60 Hz display refreshes every 16.67 ms, this is because 1 / 60 = 0.0166 (16.67) ms. This means that the monitor picks up the frame in the GPU's frame-buffer every 16.67 ms, meanwhile the GPU draws a frame in the back-buffer. It then copies the frame in the back-buffer to the frame-buffer as often as it can.

Okay, so we know that a 60 Hz display refreshes every 16.67, but why does it tear? That is because the monitor has a set refresh rate, and it picks up the frame from the frame-buffer, at the same time the back-buffer copies it's frame to the frame-buffer.

It's not the monitor that is half finished, it's the graphics card that is half finished and the monitor that is causing it. The monitor has a set refresh rate, again: 60 Hz = 16.67 ms. The graphics card does not.

V-sync, G-sync, FreeSync (if you use AMD graphics--you don't), will stop this from happening. However, by using a 120 Hz panel. What happens is that screen tearing occurs twice as much on a 120 Hz display, than on a 60 Hz--but why is the 120 Hz display better? That is because the difference between 2 frames, is going to be much smaller (faster). Simple math tells us that 1 / 120 = 0.0083 ms. That is indeed much lower (faster) than what a 60 Hz (16.67 ms) display is capable of. Provided you can push 120 FPS in games, though anything above 60 is gradually going to feel smoother and smoother, and minimize the screen tear up to 120 FPS.

This is because the frame that is tearing, spends half as much time as the 60 Hz display, on screen. The result is that it's very hard for us to actually notice the tearing, on a 120 Hz display, in comparison to a 60 Hz display.

So if I would just get a 144hz monitor with 1ms respond time and it would be hard to. Notice screen tearing even at 240fps In minecraft which I would probs limit the frames to 144 in mc but just wondering

 

[Suzuki@1473780084@1473780163]

Yes. Harder to see but not gone. You will need to use Vsync or Gsync for that.

 

[catsarecute]

Yes. Harder to see but not gone. You will need to use Vsync or Gsync for that.

I can get
Any monitor pm cyber power pc and I kid want the best one gam g and good screen