-Linux vs Windows-

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

belvdr

Distinguished
Mar 26, 2006
380
0
18,780
Yeah, i guess your right, but he wants speed, and he said that hes not afraid of the command line. Gentoo is pretty much the fastest, most streamlined distro out there because you build it specificly for your hardware.

It hasnt changed, you can just install Gentoo from a cd like any other distro, but to get every last ounce of performance out of a machine installing from the command line is the way to go.

The beautiful thing is that most distributions are now compiled for i686 architecture, so it makes Gentoo's point moot. I tried both SuSE and Gentoo on my machine and noticed zero difference in speed of the system. Of course, installation of Gentoo took way longer than I cared for. It seemed I poured hours into the installation, and how long before I break even from any additional speed of the system?
 

CaptRobertApril

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2006
2,205
0
19,780
@ Centurion

The problem with running CS under WINE is that it apparently slows it down a whole whack. That's what I understand anyway. Can't say I've ever tried WINE.

@ sandmanwm

The Win2003 suggestion is very interesting. I certainly won't go to Vista anytime soon as I have several serious problems with the OS and the way it's designed.

@ ches111

The prob I have with going with Gentoo or some other exotic form of Linux is that my system is mission-critical. When I'm on deadline, I can't get up to pee let alone be fudging around troubleshooting or doing an OS reinstall. I need something rocksolid. Ubuntu has a nice reputation, I'll definitely give it that.

@ apt403

Do we know anyone in Google who can get us a copy of Goob for "testing" purposes?

:D
 

apt403

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2006
2,923
0
20,780
@ apt403

Do we know anyone in Google who can get us a copy of Goob for "testing" purposes?

:D

There have got to be well over 10,000 registered users on this forum, chances are that there are a couple who also work at google. Now, if we could convince one of them to let us "borrow" a copy Goobunutu or not is another story. Although i am the interwebnets*, so im sure i could just snake my way into there computer and run away with a copy of Goobuntu.

*Seriously, i am the interwebnets, my entire being is stored on a server somewhere that has control over everything internet related, and i am in control of that server.
 

CaptRobertApril

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2006
2,205
0
19,780
@ apt403

Do we know anyone in Google who can get us a copy of Goob for "testing" purposes?

:D

There have got to be well over 10,000 registered users on this forum, chances are that there are a couple who also work at google. Now, if we could convince one of them to let us "borrow" a copy Goobunutu or not is another story. Although i am the interwebnets*, so im sure i could just snake my way into there computer and run away with a copy of Goobuntu.

*Seriously, i am the interwebnets, my entire being is stored on a server somewhere that has control over everything internet related, and i am in control of that server.

Oh yeah? Well, I'm a holograph and I'm interfaced directly to the main computer core thus have exclusive access to all the best pr0n! :lol:

Come on guys. Let's see if there's some way of sneaking a copy of Goob. It sounds like a lot of fun!
 

gman01

Distinguished
Jun 25, 2006
272
0
18,780
Stick with fedora or kubuntu, and you will not have any problems:
during install click to add kde desktop instead of gnome desktop....
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
http://www.fedoraforum.org/ - for all your questions

my advise to you is use the kde desktop, and not gnome so try kubuntu instead of ubuntu
http://www.kubuntu.com/

there is nothing to fear, if you can use windows you can use linux.... you will notice the speed difference from windows right away.... Linux is very slim.... If you pick the 64 bit version the ony 32 bit app you might want to run is firefox browser.... there is no flash support for 64 bit firefox browser(long story)....

if you don't want to dload alot of gigs you can buy any linux distribution here for like $10.00
http://linuxcentral.com/_v3/
 

ches111

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2006
1,958
0
19,780
Gman,

I already have multiple installs of Linux flavors, from Fedora Core 6 (uuuggghhh) to Centos, to Redhat enterprise edition.

I have been in the NIX arena for many many many years. Man I am old!! :)
 

gman01

Distinguished
Jun 25, 2006
272
0
18,780
Sorry - that wasn't meant for you.... I was trying to reply to '' M25' the guy who asked the original question on what to do....
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
Thanks a lot for the advice. What about driver support, especially modems, because the modem I have does not work on RedHat 8 and SUSE 9.1 I have tried.
 

ches111

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2006
1,958
0
19,780
Chances are the modem you have is what is called a "winmodem".

If you are having difficulty running these you can google for a fix.

Many wireless adapters are similar and have issue with running under Linux.

Many times it is a matter of using a wrapper (like the NDIS wrapper used to make the wireless cards on notebooks work).

Some winmodems actually work in Linux but only after some trial and effort.

Which modem do you have?

Please see HERE!
 

SSS_DDK

Distinguished
Jan 28, 2007
136
0
18,680
Let me give you the clearest image you'll get:
1- if you work with OpenGL, you have no option but Linux...It is true that some ports of Open GL exist for windows (besides the original windows support for 1.0) but performance wise, you're better off running openGL on Linux..If you want DX on the other hand....go for Windows (no alternative)

2-If you plan on using Nvidia cards, use linux...especially if you want to program your GPU...u need the latest openGL with free support (you'll need it)
If you want ATI, better stick with Windows

3-Driver installation will almost kill you on Linux...LinModems or WinModems or whatever...basically you'll need special drivers for almost every gadget...the good news is, if you're programming, the API for Linux (Nvidia Wize) is great (ATI cut their Linux division a while ago so their drivers aren't top of the line)

4-I still find your question strange..i never met a guy who wants to program cutting edge graphics and found no better place to ask a question than tomshardware forums... there are far more specialized websites, forums, mailing lists etc.... There are Billions spent yearly on graphics programming, every lab, major conference (hundreds each year) has its proceedings detailing the best tweaks and glitches.

5-Overall, if you're a developper, a serious one, not some bored guy trying to impress his GF with a 3D scenegraph.....do some serious research first (again if you want cutting edge)
 

sailer

Splendid
OK, and how is software support; I have heard SUSE has a very large base. and what about a good VM for it; I don;t like do dual boot but don't even want to be p!ssed for some windows only SW.

This is something I've wondered about, since I have a spare computer at the moment. I've been thinking about trying a 64 bit version of linux, whether Susie or some other maker, putting it on a new hard disc so if something messes up, I still have the old disc with XP on it. I haven't tried anything with Linux for years, and back then support was pretty bad, but wonder what its like now.
 

rodney_ws

Splendid
Dec 29, 2005
3,819
0
22,810
Ironic.. I'm installing Suse on the infamous P2 right now. ~_~

You installing SUSE on an Intel 80286?
I hope this reply was a joke... a P2 is a Pentium 2, not a 286. Suse Linux is a 32 bit (or 64!) OS and would be impossible to run on a 286 (16 bit) Man, I hope you were kidding when you said that.
 

apt403

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2006
2,923
0
20,780
Thats why i put the question mark at the end, it should be impossible, but i dunno, maybe the Ninja is some crazy hacker and he rewrote the entite OS for 16bit cpus.
 
Thats why i put the question mark at the end, it should be impossible, but i dunno, maybe the Ninja is some crazy hacker and he rewrote the entite OS for 16bit cpus.
I think I said somewhere that my programming skills are not as good as I would like them to be.
 

linux_0

Splendid
Moving to 64bit linux will improve performance 25-80% on AMD64 hardware vs. 32bit.

On P4 hardware is will be about 2-5% slower.

On intel Core based CPUs it should run faster in 64bit vs. 32bit not sure by how much.


I would recommend both Fedora Core 6 x86_64 and Ubuntu-6.10-amd64 desktop / x86_64.

Fedora Core 6 comes with Blender, K3D, GIMP and many other similar packages and is very easy to use and install.

Ubuntu has the apt repos, all the debian goodness and is quite easy to use as well.

Both have good hardware support and updated quite frequently.

http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/6/x86_64/iso/FC-6-x86_64-DVD.iso

http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu-releases/6.10/ubuntu-6.10-desktop-amd64.iso


GL :-D




I know the title says 'move this thread from here', but my problem is actually CPU related and needs hardware guys;
I do a lot of 3D modeling, rendering and less photo editing, but most of the software I use are open source and also available for Linux. I continuously hear that Linux consumes much less resources, and experience the hunger of XP. I have also found out that 64bit systems improve my performance, so, If I do it, I should transition to a 64bit Linux,...now:
Is moving to a 64bit SUSE Linux going to somehow improve the performance of my current system?!
 

rodney_ws

Splendid
Dec 29, 2005
3,819
0
22,810
I am not a fan of suse, as it seems to be the most system hogging distro that I have found. I recommend using ubuntu, it's based off of debian but is a little more user-friendly.
Here's the link to download the 64bit iso. You won't regret it.
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/ubuntu-releases/edgy/ubuntu-6.10-desktop-amd64.iso

Speak of the devil... I just finished downloading and burning my Ubuntu 6.10 ISO from that site... man, that's weird. Although I have an AMD X2, I got the 32 bit version as the benchmarks I saw show no difference between the two versions... in fact, the 32 bit version was slightly faster in gaming performance. If I have enough free time and determination I intend to play WoW (if only once) on Linux just to say I've done it. I'm really getting fed up with Microsoft and I guess Linux is my only alternative (please, no pro-Mac replies to this comment)
 

gman01

Distinguished
Jun 25, 2006
272
0
18,780
chess111 is right, it is probably a winmodem(software modem).... You need to either do some manually configurations or do what I did - buy a hardware modem.... they usually connect better at higher speeds anyway....
see here: they are $36.00 instead of $20.00
http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewproduct.asp?PID=MODEMS-USR&updepts=MDM&DNAME=Modems

as for red hat 8.0 - that is very old and out of date.... get rid of it.... The newest version is fedora core 6(they don't use the name red hat anymore except for servers).... you can even get winmodems to work if you want to try....
 

zarooch

Distinguished
Apr 28, 2006
350
0
18,780
Moving to 64bit linux will improve performance 25-80% on AMD64 hardware vs. 32bit.

On P4 hardware is will be about 2-5% slower.

On intel Core based CPUs it should run faster in 64bit vs. 32bit not sure by how much.


I would recommend both Fedora Core 6 x86_64 and Ubuntu-6.10-amd64 desktop / x86_64.

Fedora Core 6 comes with Blender, K3D, GIMP and many other similar packages and is very easy to use and install.

Ubuntu has the apt repos, all the debian goodness and is quite easy to use as well.

Both have good hardware support and updated quite frequently.

http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/6/x86_64/iso/FC-6-x86_64-DVD.iso

http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu-releases/6.10/ubuntu-6.10-desktop-amd64.iso


GL :-D




I know the title says 'move this thread from here', but my problem is actually CPU related and needs hardware guys;
I do a lot of 3D modeling, rendering and less photo editing, but most of the software I use are open source and also available for Linux. I continuously hear that Linux consumes much less resources, and experience the hunger of XP. I have also found out that 64bit systems improve my performance, so, If I do it, I should transition to a 64bit Linux,...now:
Is moving to a 64bit SUSE Linux going to somehow improve the performance of my current system?!

thanx a lot for replying on my request! I hope the OP will find it helpful!
 

funnyman06

Distinguished
Dec 13, 2006
167
0
18,680
i enjoy installing Ubuntu on my Athlon XP 3200, The install in fast and simple, but ubuntu is not the fastest Linux distro, but in my experience it is one of the easiest to work with.

The fastest Distro i know of is Slackware, Its also a simple install, but if you need anything from kernel 2.6 it gets a little bit more interesting, since slack is all about stability. But i know that you can install it on a 2.6 kernel and the creators of the Kernel have already stated that the 2.6 Kernel is extremely stable at this point. So that might work for you.

As far as a video card goes, def go nvidia, its a simple driver install, the latest beta is really good, and with all the CPU power you can install like AIGLX or Beryl for some of the nicest eye candy ever, put you and your box on like OSX status.

But all in all, by in large with 8 CPUs and 8 gigs of ram, any Linux distro will be fast, it will just take some time to get your Linux box up and how you like it, and with like Gentoo it could take a couple days or even a week with all the tweaking you can go there, or with Ubuntu you could be done in a matter of hours.

But if all your programs come with 64 bit versions then def use the 64 bit version, otherwise your waisting your time, and you wont be using all the extra registers.

Also make sure when you install whatever OS it is, make sure you have SMP/SMT support or a SMP kernel installed, because i don't know if Ubuntu will automatically install an SMP kernel if it detects more than 1 CPU, but if it doesn't its really easy with apt. since there are many resources for Ubuntu since its just a face for Debian.
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
4-I still find your question strange..i never met a guy who wants to program cutting edge graphics and found no better place to ask a question than tomshardware forums... there are far more specialized websites, forums, mailing lists etc.... There are Billions spent yearly on graphics programming, every lab, major conference (hundreds each year) has its proceedings detailing the best tweaks and glitches.
I was first looking for a general opinion and there were 2 main reasons for chosing the CPU forum
1-It's the only forum I regularly write on; a lot of familiar people :D
2-Since in my job (modelling, rendering, graphics etc) I need 101% from my hardware, I thought people with a lot of CPU knowledge were the best option for this opinion.

5-Overall, if you're a developper, a serious one, not some bored guy trying to impress his GF with a 3D scenegraph.....do some serious research first (again if you want cutting edge)
Nooo, I have to invent other tricks, because my GF is an architect like me and does not get easily impressed by my 3D stuff :D
I really want to do a serious search and yesterday googled for Linux reviews, but most of them were just descriptive reviews rather than comparative of performance showcasing.... I'll keep looking[/quote]
 

funnyman06

Distinguished
Dec 13, 2006
167
0
18,680
Hey dude, if you have the time and patience then id try out like a couple different versions and find out what your favorite is, like take a weekend or some week when you don't need that one computer and find the best distro for your needs, there is no one perfect one. Linux can do what you want and probably better than windows can, but it will take more work, But in the end its worth it, no real virus concerns, no firewall issues. And every time you install an update you don't have to reboot the whole computer.

And if you don't update your box, its fine, because they only fix little things and if it works then i wouldn't change anything on something mission critical like that.
 

linux_0

Splendid
What CPU do you intend to use? How many CPUs? What kind of motherboard?

This will help us help you :-D




4-I still find your question strange..i never met a guy who wants to program cutting edge graphics and found no better place to ask a question than tomshardware forums... there are far more specialized websites, forums, mailing lists etc.... There are Billions spent yearly on graphics programming, every lab, major conference (hundreds each year) has its proceedings detailing the best tweaks and glitches.
I was first looking for a general opinion and there were 2 main reasons for chosing the CPU forum
1-It's the only forum I regularly write on; a lot of familiar people :D
2-Since in my job (modelling, rendering, graphics etc) I need 101% from my hardware, I thought people with a lot of CPU knowledge were the best option for this opinion.

5-Overall, if you're a developper, a serious one, not some bored guy trying to impress his GF with a 3D scenegraph.....do some serious research first (again if you want cutting edge)
Nooo, I have to invent other tricks, because my GF is an architect like me and does not get easily impressed by my 3D stuff :D
I really want to do a serious search and yesterday googled for Linux reviews, but most of them were just descriptive reviews rather than comparative of performance showcasing.... I'll keep looking[/quote]
 

TRENDING THREADS