List of Cards

[psygno]

It's becoming harder and harder to follow the industry of the graphic card. In the past names where quite logic : the higher the number, the more powerful.
Nowadays, they're adding extensions and it's becoming messy.

Can anyone provide me a list ordered, by performance of the current Nvidia and ATI video cards ?
Thanks

 

[HardWareBoss]

Read the Graphic card buyers guide.

 

[TheRod]

I will make it easy for you :
<A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=363095#363095" target="_new">Click here</A> then <A HREF="http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031229/index.html" target="_new">click here</A>.

--
It's tricky to use words like <b><font color=green>AMD</font color=green></b> or <b><font color=blue>Intel</font color=blue></b> in a signature some users could think your are biased.

 

[pauldh]

<A HREF="http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/over2003/" target="_new"> This Review </A> will help you compare some of the varieties within each card group. For instance 256MB vs. 128MB, 64-bit vs. 128 Bit, or pro vs. non-pro vs. SE. It also has rarely reviewed cards such as the PC Radeon 9600 Pro EZ version clocked 400/400. Note how it is nowwhere near a 9600 Pro but more like a 9600 non pro in perfomance. This is just if you really need to know. otherwise, the buyers guide does a good job of telling you what cards to look for and which to avoid.





ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 512MB Corsair TwinX PC3200LL, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt

 

[HardWareBoss]

I wanted him to work like everyone else has to.

 

[TheRod]

I just wanted to help him a bit! I feel generous today!

--
It's tricky to use words like <b><font color=green>AMD</font color=green></b> or <b><font color=blue>Intel</font color=blue></b> in a signature some users could think your are biased.