Looks like Intel has been busy

[intelamduser]

http://www.latestpatents.com/2007/02/13/intel-patents-granted-on-13-february-2007/

 

[LordPope]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

 

[intelamduser]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

 

[ajfink]

Only 47? Sheesh, I call that Thursday.

 

[heartview]

Only 47? Sheesh, I call that Thursday.

These are just the ones that got granted, it does not include all of the applications.

 

[tamalero]

47 is a slow day for IBM


http://www.latestpatents.com/2007/02/13/ibm-patents-granted-on-13-february-2007/

 

[jkflipflop98]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

Actually, we've found the best way to recover the billions that we spend on R&D every year. We take what we've been researching, put it in a chip, then sell it. It's so crazy, it's gotta work!

 

[dasickninja]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

Actually, we've found the best way to recover the billions that we spend on R&D every year. We take what we've been researching, put it in a chip, then sell it. It's so crazy, it's gotta work!
:trophy:

 

[RandMcnally]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

Actually, we've found the best way to recover the billions that we spend on R&D every year. We take what we've been researching, put it in a chip, then sell it. It's so crazy, it's gotta work!
:trophy:
Like Netburst!

 

[wolverinero79]

You ARE on a roll lately.

Ok, go back to work and make us some more great chips!

 

[BaldEagle]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

Actually, we've found the best way to recover the billions that we spend on R&D every year. We take what we've been researching, put it in a chip, then sell it. It's so crazy, it's gotta work!
:trophy:
Like Netburst!


OUCH...The truth can be painful.....Netbust a waste of how much...

 

[SSS_DDK]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

Actually, we've found the best way to recover the billions that we spend on R&D every year. We take what we've been researching, put it in a chip, then sell it. It's so crazy, it's gotta work!
:trophy:
Like Netburst!


OUCH...The truth can be painful.....Netbust a waste of how much...

Well thank god there was the Athlon to give Intel a kick in the ...else we'd never have had Core2

 

[Sirfiroth]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

No just another day at the Office.

 

[BaldEagle]

[quote="SSS_DDK

Well thank god there was the Athlon to give Intel a kick in the ...else we'd never have had Core2[/quote]

Actually AMD gave Intel a kick in family jewels with the slot mounted Athlons before Netbust came out. Netburst started with the P4 line shortly after the introduction of the Athlon Thunderbird. Core2Duo came from the Pentium-M line and departed from the crank up the clock speed mentality of the Netburst line.

We should actually thank AMD marketing for the Core2Duo because they are responsible for breaking down the gigahertz myth crap Intel was spreading about processors with the Athlon naming convention. The sucess of the Athlon line proved that the buyers could figure out what was better based on factors other than clock speed alone. Intel abandonded the quest for maximum speed (and Heat) and refocused on delivering more instruction performance per clock cycle rather than simply more clock cycles.

 

[dasickninja]

Umm, Intel never said GHz sells. There is no marketing statement to that effect.

 

[qcmadness]

http://www.latestpatents.com/2007/02/13/intel-patents-granted-on-13-february-2007/

Intel does so, AMD does so, IBM does so.

To protect themselves, they have to apply for patent.

 

[tamalero]

Umm, Intel never said GHz sells. There is no marketing statement to that effect.

you're kidding right?
all the P4 marketting was about its "SUPER ULTRA MEGAHURTZ"

 

[dasickninja]

That maybe true, but they never, in any statements, said GHz sells. We all put two and two together, but they never did.

 

[tamalero]

That maybe true, but they never, in any statements, said GHz sells. We all put two and two together, but they never did.

not sure where you live but in my country they sure did
every intel ad it had the Mhz speed in BOLD LETTERS and HUGE
almost bigger than the Intel inside logo

 

[dasickninja]

I live in the US. They advertised the speed. AMD's PR rating attempts to do the same. Its a technicality, but the truth one the less.

 

[cwj717]

yeah INTEL is planning alot of hurt on AMD

I would hope that the advancments of any company are to build a better product instead of trying to do away with a competitor. Probably a naive position to take becuase most of or a lot of these patents are ones which Intel will be licensing. And I guess thats how to recover the millions spent on R&D.

Actually, we've found the best way to recover the billions that we spend on R&D every year. We take what we've been researching, put it in a chip, then sell it. It's so crazy, it's gotta work!
:trophy:
Like Netburst! Not all Netburst chips were bad... the northwood and prestonia cores were great

 

[cwj717]

Umm, Intel never said GHz sells. There is no marketing statement to that effect.

you're kidding right?
all the P4 marketting was about its "SUPER ULTRA MEGAHURTZ" The GHz myth was already established... Intel just took advantage of that with netburst.

 

[InteliotInside]

Umm, Intel never said GHz sells. There is no marketing statement to that effect.

you're kidding right?
all the P4 marketting was about its "SUPER ULTRA MEGAHURTZ" The GHz myth was already established... Intel just took advantage of that with netburst.

Yep.

AMD started the GHz myth when they made the first retail 1GHz chip (IIRC).

Bit them in the ass when NetBurst, an inferior but highly clocked chip arch sold a lot more than the superior Hammer. For households anyway (IT techs for the server market saw past the smoke screen).