low benchmark results

[sinister]

Hello I am hoping someone can help me here. I have tried a few benchmark sites now and they all show my benchmarks way below average for the same components.
https://novabench.com/view/1355838
http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/5623040
I am hoping to figure out the issue. I use a driver updater tool and made sure everything is up to date and a fresh install of win 10 64 bit and still the same results. I am hoping to do let someone have permission to take over my pc and check things out if at all possible.
Thanks much.
Steve

 

[Finstar]

I don't know about novabench but userbenchmark didn't show anything out of the ordinary. The only thing i can imagine is your cpu bottlenecking your gpu.

 

[sinister]

I don't know about novabench but userbenchmark didn't show anything out of the ordinary. The only thing i can imagine is your cpu bottlenecking

userbench shows pretty much everything in my PC way below average tho

 

[Finstar]

The only parts working under spec are your ssd and ram
The SSD could simply be slower due to it's age.
And the lower ram speed could be caused by really anything which isn't unusual in any way.

 

[sinister]

The only parts working under spec are your ssd and ram
The SSD could simply be slower due to it's age.
And the lower ram speed could be caused by really anything which isn't unusual in any way.

 

[bignastyid]

The only parts working under spec are your ssd and ram
The SSD could simply be slower due to it's age.
And the lower ram speed could be caused by really anything which isn't unusual in any way.

When using the reply option you need to type your reply after /quotemsg

 

[sinister]

The only parts working under spec are your ssd and ram
The SSD could simply be slower due to it's age.
And the lower ram speed could be caused by really anything which isn't unusual in any way.

So when it says this about my GPU..

Nvidia GTX 1070-$545
182,856 User benchmarks - Average bench 99%
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

And this about my RAM ...
Unknown 4x4GB
17,317 User benchmarks - Average bench 45%
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

And this about my SSD..
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$168
15,623 User benchmarks - Average bench 62%
62GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port

It doesn't actually mean they are running bad even tho it says they are ? I am confused lol

 

[Finstar]

The only parts working under spec are your ssd and ram
The SSD could simply be slower due to it's age.
And the lower ram speed could be caused by really anything which isn't unusual in any way.

So when it says this about my GPU..

Nvidia GTX 1070-$545
182,856 User benchmarks - Average bench 99%
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

And this about my RAM ...
Unknown 4x4GB
17,317 User benchmarks - Average bench 45%
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

And this about my SSD..
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$168
15,623 User benchmarks - Average bench 62%
62GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port

It doesn't actually mean they are running bad even tho it says they are ? I am confused lol

Userbenchmark is known to be pretty inaccurate with some parts.
If the pc performs like you want it to, then there's no reason to let some benchmark tell you otherwise.

 

[sinister]

The only parts working under spec are your ssd and ram
The SSD could simply be slower due to it's age.
And the lower ram speed could be caused by really anything which isn't unusual in any way.

So when it says this about my GPU..

Nvidia GTX 1070-$545
182,856 User benchmarks - Average bench 99%
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

And this about my RAM ...
Unknown 4x4GB
17,317 User benchmarks - Average bench 45%
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

And this about my SSD..
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$168
15,623 User benchmarks - Average bench 62%
62GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port

It doesn't actually mean they are running bad even tho it says they are ? I am confused lol

Userbenchmark is known to be pretty inaccurate with some parts.
If the pc performs like you want it to, then there's no reason to let some benchmark tell you otherwise.

I tried a few benchmarks and they all said the same thing so I just wanted to get things in order and running like they should be for the new COD ww2 release on the 3rd lol

 

[bignastyid]

You also have to remember that users who overclock also run those benchmarks(usually multiple times) so those can skew the results if you are running at stock settings. But you should in all honesty be looking at upgrading to a newer platform(cpu, motherboard and ram) like Ryzen or Coffee Lake, especially if you are a gamer that old cpu is going to struggle.

DDR3 1333 is fairly slow so that low score is not surprising at all.

The userbenchmark test indicated higher background usage which will drop the score and if whatever was running in the background was accessing the SSD it would lower that score.

 

[bignastyid]

Your cpu does not meet the minimum requirements for COD WW2, so even at it's peak performance theres a good chance it will not run well. The Ryzen 5 1400 is a fair amount faster than your Phenom.

 

[sinister]

You also have to remember that users who overclock also run those benchmarks(usually multiple times) so those can skew the results if you are running at stock settings. But you should in all honesty be looking at upgrading to a newer platform(cpu, motherboard and ram) like Ryzen or Coffee Lake, especially if you are a gamer that old cpu is going to struggle.

DDR3 1333 is fairly slow so that low score is not surprising at all.

The userbenchmark test indicated higher background usage which will drop the score and if whatever was running in the background was accessing the SSD it would lower that score.

Hmm damn I just paid $500 for that CPU thats what it sells for still. Didnt know it was not that good. Dang darn. Well I guess I have to just look at saving a pile of more money lol

 

[Finstar]

You also have to remember that users who overclock also run those benchmarks(usually multiple times) so those can skew the results if you are running at stock settings. But you should in all honesty be looking at upgrading to a newer platform(cpu, motherboard and ram) like Ryzen or Coffee Lake, especially if you are a gamer that old cpu is going to struggle.

DDR3 1333 is fairly slow so that low score is not surprising at all.

The userbenchmark test indicated higher background usage which will drop the score and if whatever was running in the background was accessing the SSD it would lower that score.

Hmm damn I just paid $500 for that CPU thats what it sells for still. Didnt know it was not that good. Dang darn. Well I guess I have to just look at saving a pile of more money lol

You paid $500 for that cpu as of late? that's a scam. That cpu is over 7 years old now.

 

[sinister]

You also have to remember that users who overclock also run those benchmarks(usually multiple times) so those can skew the results if you are running at stock settings. But you should in all honesty be looking at upgrading to a newer platform(cpu, motherboard and ram) like Ryzen or Coffee Lake, especially if you are a gamer that old cpu is going to struggle.

DDR3 1333 is fairly slow so that low score is not surprising at all.

The userbenchmark test indicated higher background usage which will drop the score and if whatever was running in the background was accessing the SSD it would lower that score.

Hmm damn I just paid $500 for that CPU thats what it sells for still. Didnt know it was not that good. Dang darn. Well I guess I have to just look at saving a pile of more money lol

You paid $500 for that cpu as of late? that's a scam. That cpu is over 7 years old now.

Came with a watercooled setup but im thinking I paid to much. Yes jist under $500 CAD

 

[bignastyid]

You also have to remember that users who overclock also run those benchmarks(usually multiple times) so those can skew the results if you are running at stock settings. But you should in all honesty be looking at upgrading to a newer platform(cpu, motherboard and ram) like Ryzen or Coffee Lake, especially if you are a gamer that old cpu is going to struggle.

DDR3 1333 is fairly slow so that low score is not surprising at all.

The userbenchmark test indicated higher background usage which will drop the score and if whatever was running in the background was accessing the SSD it would lower that score.

Hmm damn I just paid $500 for that CPU thats what it sells for still. Didnt know it was not that good. Dang darn. Well I guess I have to just look at saving a pile of more money lol

You've been had/swindled. That cpu can get outperformed by a $60 dual core kabylake Pentium.

 

[Finstar]

Either of these is what i'd recommend upgrading to next:
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz 6-Core Processor ($261.50 @ shopRBC)
Motherboard: ASRock - AB350 Pro4 ATX AM4 Motherboard ($129.99 @ Newegg Canada)
Memory: G.Skill - Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 Memory ($194.99 @ Newegg Canada)
Total: $586.48
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-11-01 19:15 EDT-0400

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i5-8400 2.8GHz 6-Core Processor ($239.99 @ Memory Express)
Motherboard: MSI - Z370-A PRO ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($149.99 @ Amazon Canada)
Memory: Kingston - FURY 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2666 Memory ($192.75 @ Vuugo)
Total: $582.73
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2017-11-01 19:23 EDT-0400

 

[sinister]

Thanks much Finstar. I guess the only thing I have at the moment is the Video card lol I will be ordering one of the two setups you suggested above over the next while part by part.
Thanks for the help