News Low-Profile LGA1700 Cooler Tames Mighty Core i9-12900K

So all it really takes these days to earn a 'good enough for the 12900K' summary is, apparently, hang a 'up to 140 W TDP' banner on the box...?

Watch out, Nocuta!

(And now the heat dissipation of the very best air coolers in the world can be crammed into a single stack about the size of a pack of cigarettes, ande smaller than a quarter of the size of the previous air cooling icons...; fascinating.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soaptrail and Mr5oh

vern72

Distinguished
Jul 15, 2012
322
59
18,860
140W of cooling? I just wanna know what the retaining clips for an AM4 socket would look like (as long as can use the hooks that are usually found with AM4 motherboards).
 

watzupken

Reputable
Mar 16, 2020
1,175
655
6,070
TDP ratings for coolers need to be taken with a pail of salt. I’ve tested a few of these low profile coolers and never found them to be truthful, or live up to what they advertised. This one looks exactly like an ID-Cooling cooler, just with a different fan slapped on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soaptrail

Soaptrail

Distinguished
Jan 12, 2015
303
96
19,420
TDP ratings for coolers need to be taken with a pail of salt. I’ve tested a few of these low profile coolers and never found them to be truthful, or live up to what they advertised. This one looks exactly like an ID-Cooling cooler, just with a different fan slapped on it.

Agreed, lets see testing otherwise take the marketing disguised as an article down. Did the company pay for this "article"?
 
So all it really takes these days to earn a 'good enough for the 12900K' summary is, apparently, hang a 'up to 140 W TDP' banner on the box...?
If it can maintain the 12900K at base clock speeds with realistic workloads, i.e., not running Prime95, then yes.

Some companies like to pride themselves on providing more than the bare minimum. Other companies only want to sell you the bare minimum.
 
So now merely maintaining minimal 'base clock speeds' of 3.2 GHz with with 99C temps is sufficient to earn '12900K-approved'? (Hey, it's not throttling if it maintains base clock, right?)

That's a good one.

LOL!

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...2900k-processor-30m-cache-up-to-5-20-ghz.html


The author can , of course, redeem himself by doing an actual test...but, it's likely this will not happen, as apparently, all we need to make CPU cooler recommendations are the manufacturer's TDP claims these days.

Good times!
 
So now merely maintaining minimal 'base clock speeds' of 3.2 GHz with with 99C temps is sufficient to earn '12900K-approved'? (Hey, it's not throttling if it maintains base clock, right?)

That's a good one.
Technically, yes. It's still doing the base speed which is what the manufacturer guarantees as long as the cooling is sufficient, which for the sake of argument, is sufficient because 99C is still less than 100C.

However, that does not mean I personally think it's a good idea. So don't take me pointing out still being within the operational parameters means I'm saying you should definitely go do it.
 
The author can , of course, redeem himself by doing an actual test...but, it's likely this will not happen, as apparently, all we need to make CPU cooler recommendations are the manufacturer's TDP claims these days.
Don't implicate the author. This was just a product launch news article. They're just passing along the manufacturer marketing info.