Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt (
More info?)
"David Maynard" <dNOTmayn@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:10hlte8r7f6uq2a@corp.supernews.com...
> Michael-NC wrote:
>
> > "David Maynard" <dNOTmayn@ev1.net> wrote in message
> > news:10hlq94fd4455e5@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> >>Michael-NC wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>><jorge.laranjo@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:cfefcb$hvr@odak26.prod.google.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi there!
> >>>>I got this hardware:
> >>>>
> >>>>* Pentium 3 Mobile 600Mhz
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>No SFF MB available and too slow for the job.
> >>
> >>He's definitely got a problem finding motherboards for a mobile P-III
but
> >>I'm not so sure you have a grasp of 'the job'.
> >
> >
> > I see your point...
> >
> >
> >>>>* HDD 2.5'' 20GB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>For a multimedia PC??? Too small, think at least 80GB and that's gonna
> >
> > fill
> >
> >>>up quick.
> >>
> >>How in the world did you interpret 'small home linux server' to mean a
> >>multimedia PC?
> >
> >
> > Ahh, there's your point. My bad, I read multimedia server there somehow.
> > That indeed renders my advice moot. Of course Linux can run on that
hardware
> > and run very well at that.
> >
> >
> >>>>* 128 MB RAM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Add another 512 MB and that'll be just about right.
> >>
> >>For a 'small home linux server'?
> >
> >
> > We already know what happened here...
> >
> >
> >>As for Windows, I hate to burst the mongo memory myth but I have two
WinXP
> >>HTPCs, a version of 'multimedia PC': one, out of necessity, runs with
128
> >>Meg RAM and the other 256 Meg; and both are perfectly capable of 'the
> >
> > job',
> >
> >>as it were.
> >
> >
> > What myth, that XP runs like a dog on 128MB? That's no myth, XP will run
but
> > disk swapping will be pretty darn severe.
>
> A fresh WinXP install uses about 96 Meg of RAM. While I wouldn't
> 'recommend' 128 Meg of RAM it works fine in my 'small' HTPC and to say
> WinXP will "run like a dog" and that "disk swapping will be pretty darn
> severe" is overly broad and presumptive. It *would* be slow if one throws
> everything, including the kitchen sink, into it but it isn't 'inherently'
> the case.
>
> > 256MB for most general use XP
> > boxes is fine.
>
> I agree.
>
> Having said that, I run 512 Meg on my two 'large' WinXP machines: the ones
> where I threw in the kitchen sink
>
> > Gaming boxes and ahem, multimedia servers benefit from all
> > the ram that you can throw at them.
> >
> > BTW, looks like the OP stripped a laptop, I wonder what type of ram he
has?
>
> Good question. Since everything else was a notebook part I'd guess he's
got
> notebook RAM as well.
eBay would be a good place for him to visit. I just put up some items there
in the last few days. The last times I sold stuff was a couple years ago. I
diligently installed an FTP client, uploading my photos and brushed up on my
very weak HTML writing. When I listed the item, I found eBay had vastly
improved the process. Now you download a little app from eBay and _they_
host your photo. You merely point to the local location of the photo and it
gets uploaded, they also have a little editor that works pretty well,
nothing fancy but gets the job done... Kinda like 128MB of ram... ;-)