Question Malwarebytes or stay with Win 11 built-in?

1405

Distinguished
Aug 26, 2012
611
13
18,995
Having used Malwarebytes since back in the WinXP days when a MB license was $25 for lifetime, I have recently been thinking about adding another MB license for a 2nd machine. (although now at a much higher cost ;-)
But times have changed. And so has Windows. Maybe I don't really need to. Is W11 built-in malware protection as good as Malwarebytes is by now? Or does MB still do a better job of stopping malware?
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator
Ah. Yes right. But when MB is installed, it appears to disable Win Virus and Threat Protection. So, is Win Def still doing the anti-virus work anyway while MB is doing the Malware work?
That only happens if you have MWB set to always do the realtime scan..
There is no need for that.

Win Defender as the always on AV tool, and MWB as a 'scan on demand' tool.
 

1405

Distinguished
Aug 26, 2012
611
13
18,995
That only happens if you have MWB set to always do the realtime scan..
There is no need for that.

Win Defender as the always on AV tool, and MWB as a 'scan on demand' tool.
Oh. So, then I wouldn't have to buy the license. I could just use the free version of MB if I'm not letting MB run in the background.
 

cAllen

Distinguished
Jun 5, 2008
177
38
18,610
When I put my new box together, I asked similar a question in here. Defender with common sense was the overall recommendation. Having been bit hard in the past, I decided to have my IT/ex-hack buddy test this against my previous solution of Kaspersky with MB Premium. Using everything from random to full out bad boy attacks we found that my previous solution protected much better when gray matter between the ears failed or was fooled. Pick your poison and keep backups.