Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (
More info?)
"Nick Vargish" <nav+posts@bandersnatch.org> wrote in message
news:87fyx1hp36.fsf@localhost.localdomain...
> "Fred Liken" <fredliken@toocool4school.com> writes:
>
> >
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/nation/11556569.htm
>
> I know you're just trolling, but come on, this is weak sauce even from
> you.
>
> Find some better material, or at least read the article before setting
> up your camp under the bridge. The man was in a coma for only 2.5
> months -- and being comatose is quite different from being in a
> vegetative state.
>
> Nick
>
I didn't want to sign up to read the article on the link above, but I seem
to recall that this man's accident happened a decade ago. Though he was
comatose for only a few months, he hadn't spoken or responded to anyone in
ten years. So it is more relevant that you might think. The fact is, we
don't really have a full understanding of brain injuries and how/why some
people recover while others do not.
Florida law allowed Schiavo's husband to remove her feeding tube, but as she
was not otherwise being kept alive by machinery, as the husband's motives
were somewhat suspect, as there was no evidence of Schiavo's true wishes,
and as her parents were willing and able to care for her, I still think
there should have been a presumption in favor of life.
Given the outcome of the legal battle, though, she should have at least been
given a lethal injection. Make no mistake about it--we did not "allow" her
to die on her own any more than we would allow a baby to die if we didn't
feed it. We killed her, plain and simple. If her death was as "euphoric" as
her husband's Hemlock Society lawyer claimed, why didn't they allow cameras
inside to film her "peaceful" death?