Yeah, it's amazing that Samsung is not even mentioned in the Article.Shouldn't this article really say Micron catch up to Samsung's current gen hardware rather than say anything about next gen? 3D NAND has been in use in Sammy SSD's for what?... A year or more right?
Wich is a very unfair comparisson. This sentence is ok for Micron publicity but it's not appropiate for a neutral technical Article (because you are neutral here, right?) for several reasons:Samsung was mentioned but not by name.
"Competing technology shipping today needs 48 layers to achieve the same density."