Microsoft Appeals Word XML Patent Ruling

[JMcEntegart]

One of the big headlines last week was the court ruling that said Microsoft was no longer allowed to sell Word in the U.S. because it infringed on a patent belonging to i4i.

Microsoft Appeals Word XML Patent Ruling : Read more

 

[ubernoobie]

Wow microsoft is getting fined so much this year

 

[wujonesj2]

I think Microsoft has done a fine enough job of "diminishing goodwill" on their own. Although I'll agree that the patent system, as it applies to the software industry, is flawed - Bad business tactics are bad business tactics. Whether the patent is legitimate or not, meeting with the product creators and sending corporate emails dismissing their claims by stating that they would make them "obsolete" is a clear indication that they are aware of the problem and are willing to play dirty. Behavior like this is not in the best interests of the market and, as such, Microsoft should be fiscally reprimanded for acting so unethically. Maybe they would give second thought to this activity if they seriously feared injunctions like this.

 

[hellwig]

Unfortunately, Word is too bloated and slow, err..., I mean big to fail. The freakin U.S. government standardized on it for christ sakes. Yes, the government recently moved to accepting only open standards (for documents), but guess what, those open standards (utilizing XML) are at the basis of this patent dispute, and the government STILL uses Word (thanks to Microsofts crappy OOXML). While I would love to see Microsoft and Word knocked off their perch, sadly the government itself can't afford to let that happen.

 

[scuba dave]

"We believe the evidence clearly demonstrates that we do not infringe and that the i4i patent is invalid."

Interesting. Not, "No, our product doesn't violate the patent" or "No, the patent says (A) and our product does (B). But instead.. just.. "Invalid" Are they gonna try to take the patent out from under i4i or something? It's gonna be fun watching MSFT squirm their way out of this one.(which they will unfortunately)

Sure does pay to have a legal monopoly AND the best lawyers money can buy. >.>

 

[IzzyCraft]

Word is bloated? Well frankly i like spell/grammar/dictionary etc in my word system maybe not on my netbook, but my workstation has plenty of power to run simple word program.

 

[falconqc]

Hey microsoft, I have an idea for you. Sell good old fashionned word with standard .docs, and just give out FREE patches to read .docx, .docm and .xml. Not allowed to sell, but you can still give it away 😉

 

[AMDnoob]

Microsoft Word 2003 FTW! I like using '03 it doesnt have tht ribbon UI (which i can see it's promise, but personally I just dont like the ribbon a whole lot) and it's relatively streamlined and does what I want it to do.

 

[SAL-e]

[citation][nom]falconqc[/nom]Hey microsoft, I have an idea for you. Sell good old fashionned word with standard .docs, and just give out FREE patches to read .docx, .docm and .xml. Not allowed to sell, but you can still give it away[/citation]
Haha... tanks to the RIAA's lawyers giving it for free is treated as "sell" for $0. There is high court ruling for that.

 

[ethanolson]

Correction to the article. They have 60-days from when the judge threw down the gavel to stop selling or importing Word that supports those particular file formats. What about Windows 7 at large, which includes Wordpad? Wordpad can now work with those files.

 

[ethanolson]

[citation][nom]SAL-e[/nom]Haha... tanks to the RIAA's lawyers giving it for free is treated as "sell" for $0. There is high court ruling for that.[/citation]

I'd be more included to think that giving something away for free on the internet would be considered a mechanism for theft. If I put something on display and somebody takes it, isn't that theft? I guess if I intended them to have it, it might be considered a gift on will call. This sales for $0.00 is garbage.

 

[uh_no]

[citation][nom]falconqc[/nom]Hey microsoft, I have an idea for you. Sell good old fashionned word with standard .docs, and just give out FREE patches to read .docx, .docm and .xml. Not allowed to sell, but you can still give it away[/citation]


you mean like their compatibility pack that you can download for free to be able to open docx files in 2003 and wordview?

 

[Guest]

^^^Who voted "uh_no" down? That is easily one of the most factual posts I've ever seen on here... I can't remember the number of times I've saved a college friends ass by directing them to the compatibility packs...

Of course, Microsoft is allowed a monopoly because they are in bed with the NSA, and pretty much facilitate any kind of spying they are ever asked for(all Windows versions, not just "evil-doer edition"). Go read detectives/forensics internet forums, they have all of their tried and true techniques for Windows/NTFS/Bitlocker stuff, but Linux, EXT3/4, Truecrypt, etc... have them in a panic, generally most of their Linux techniques rely on user oversight and luck, not "gifts" from Microsoft.

 

[r_manic]

I agree super_sleuth, which is why I voted his post up! 😉

 

[Guest]

I really hope this stay of the injunction is thrown aside and MS is not allowed to sell Word. I believe that this is what MS needs (as well as the consumer). MS will realize that there can be grave consequences to their anti competitive behavior. I think it could also set a precedent that the government is not scared to slap even the largest corporations with severe penalties. It will discourage larger corporations from steamrolling the little guy. Where the EU fine related to IE/Netscape was a slap on the wrist, this action is a kick in the groin to MS that they should remember a long time. This will serious cripple one of Microsoft's core revenue streams.

 

[uh_no]

except that the original patent was pretty ridiculous...