[citation][nom]de5_roy[/nom]kinect is an invention?kinect's uses in different situations make it better tham wii's controllers. i wonder if nintendo will ever let wii controllers be hacked.[/citation]
already has been, and it can make 3d tech that beats the crap out of current tech, especially for games.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw
[citation][nom]MrSphex[/nom]Lets also pretend the Kinect is actually 'revolutionary'[/citation]
it is... just not inside of games.
to a developer on a budget, or a 1 man game, they can motion capture, and they can even rough make any 3d model with the kinect,
the applications outside of games is FAR greater than anything inside of them.
[citation][nom]dalethepcman[/nom]So you think attaching a glowing baseball to the end of a Wii controller is more of a revolution than a computer controlled by natural movement and voice? I would hate to live in the future of your dreams...[/citation]
in the purpose of gaming, the ps3 move is FAR better than the wii, which puts the camera in your hand. it also allows you to use 2 motion tracking devices for 1 player, apposed to using 2, and i am assuming that its also cheaper, on top of having more in game functions. the problem is, people look at it as a ball of light on top of a wii controller without understanding why. let me ask this, besides a wii mote controller like shame, what other shapes are there for a motion controller? there are 2 answers, there are none currently, which is true, and there are no practical other shapes that conform to any game, which is also true.