Microsoft Squashes Bugs With Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 15058

[Guest]

Much like the previous release, Build 15046, this latest preview build is more focused on addressing problems with earlier updates than on adding new features to the operating system.

Microsoft Squashes Bugs With Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 15058 : Read more

 

[problematiq]

Now fix where it warns you that it's about to restart and you click the restart later button, and it restarts the pc. Also the upgrade windows 7 to 10 bugs, like the random BSOD's and the OS self destruction, like the bug that caused anyone using 3rd party drive encryption software to have their OS's self-destruct.

 

[timbo80]

Hasen't windows always self-destructed given enough time over the years? Dont think, save for "maybe" Win NT, i ever remember a consumer windows build being totally stable and not slowly corrupting itself regardless of the hardware it runs on.
Personally, i usually install apps to an secondary drive now and save "all" important data to a media drive or NAS and just plan on it crapping out and having to re-install. I know the push is for Win10 now, but honestly i got almost a year out of 8.1 and a brand new 10 build is showing signs of corruption less than a month after install. Mind you this is all on too shelf hardware and overclocking is not in the mix to hang problems on.
Boy oh boy would it be nice to get a genuinely stable build from microsoft vs all the "features" they keep trying to add on and cram down everyone's throats...
Just my 2c,
Tim

 

[dstarr3]

Hasen't windows always self-destructed given enough time over the years? Dont think, save for "maybe" Win NT, i ever remember a consumer windows build being totally stable and not slowly corrupting itself regardless of the hardware it runs on.
Personally, i usually install apps to an secondary drive now and save "all" important data to a media drive or NAS and just plan on it crapping out and having to re-install. I know the push is for Win10 now, but honestly i got almost a year out of 8.1 and a brand new 10 build is showing signs of corruption less than a month after install. Mind you this is all on too shelf hardware and overclocking is not in the mix to hang problems on.
Boy oh boy would it be nice to get a genuinely stable build from microsoft vs all the "features" they keep trying to add on and cram down everyone's throats...
Just my 2c,
Tim

My current Windows 7 installation is about 6 years old, even migrated from one PC to a new one. Don't have any problems whatsoever. Extremely stable OS even over a very long time.

 

[Giroro]

What is an "advertising ID" and how do I permanently get it off of my computer?

 

[cwolf78]

ANONYMOUS SAID:
Hasen't windows always self-destructed given enough time over the years?

As a MCSE and a Windows user since 3.1, (NT 4.0 on the server side), I have to disagree. Sure, Windows installations get slower over time with "crud" especially in the old days, and sure, some Windows versions are less stable than others - but to say that they become completely unusable is just untrue barring hardware or malware issues. The closest thing I can even think of is adding or removing hardware or roles from NT 4.0 was sometimes a process that required a reinstall of the OS (no plug and play,) but once it got up and running it was as stable as a rock. I'd say Windows ME was among the most unstable on the consumer side. I think the pinnacle was probably Windows 8.1, questionable GUI design notwithstanding. Windows 10 is certainly a step back in terms of stability, but each officially released build tends to get incrementally better.