Microsoft Still Trying to Patent Windows Vista's ReadyBoost

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
so they want to patent putting a pagefile/swap on any external device? m$ is trying to pull an apple.
 

mrmike_49

Distinguished
Feb 2, 2010
709
0
19,060
[citation][nom]theTwiz[/nom]so they want to patent putting a pagefile/swap on any external device? m$ is trying to pull an apple.[/citation]
really!

real basic idea, and actually I think I came up with it first, so M$ needs to pay me
 

nekatreven

Distinguished
Feb 20, 2007
415
0
18,780
Although I admit that I turn off ReadyBoost and Superfetch on every system I use, I still think you guys are talking out your a$$.

I wasn't aware that anyone else besides Microsoft had implemented a second swap service for faster solid state devices and an algorithm to detect what should be swapped to 'Boost, what should go to normal swap, and what should not be swapped (based on criteria such as the percentage of random io being done on items needing to be swapped).

Regardless of my feelings that ReadyBoost doesn't work well enough to be worth the hassle, and that it is 100 times better to spend a few more dollars to add RAM.... you should either start listing the operating systems you know of that also do this.... or otherwise kindly stop spouting trash about subjects that make your ignorance shine.

(And fyi I am aware that most operating systems implement paging priorities, but for the most part they fill the highest priority swap device and move on to the next. They don't subdivide based on workload, so it isn't the same.)
 
ReadyBoost was largely forgotten after vista for two reasons:

1. The proliferation of cheap, high density, high speed DDR3 RAM. Windows natively caches some files in the RAM already and most systems today have 8-16GiB installed so there's really no need to use it.

2. External flash is still heavily bottlenecked by the dated USB2.0 specification. 480mbps peak is nothing compared to the 3gbps link between the same IO controller and the hard disk cache. It's also trivial compared to the RAM caching mentioned avove.

I imagine the reason that they're still pushing for it is because USB3.0 will allow for today's much larger external flash based storage to boost performance like it was supposed to several years ago.
 
Well, the new X79 boards all have this SRT thing which is actually readyboost.... so you can understand what MS is trying to do, every processor with SRT and every chip maker using SSD caching will have to pay MS..... that's a heel of a lot of dough.....
All the leading board makers are using this as the new marketing gimmic, so every board that sells......:) MS has a dime to pocket.....
 

danwat1234

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2008
1,395
0
19,310
[citation][nom]Pinhedd[/nom]ReadyBoost was largely forgotten after vista for two reasons:1. The proliferation of cheap, high density, high speed DDR3 RAM. Windows natively caches some files in the RAM already and most systems today have 8-16GiB installed so there's really no need to use it.2. External flash is still heavily bottlenecked by the dated USB2.0 specification. 480mbps peak is nothing compared to the 3gbps link between the same IO controller and the hard disk cache. It's also trivial compared to the RAM caching mentioned avove.I imagine the reason that they're still pushing for it is because USB3.0 will allow for today's much larger external flash based storage to boost performance like it was supposed to several years ago.[/citation]


Microsoft uses Readyboost on external storage devices that have high performance when it comes to highly random i/o. USB 2.0 isn't much of a bottleneck here. The goal of readyboost is to reduce the load of the mechanical hard drive of random access, which is a mechanical drive's slow point. It isn't supposed to offload sequential transfer operations.
 

randomizer

Champion
Moderator
[citation][nom]theTwiz[/nom]so they want to patent putting a pagefile/swap on any external device? m$ is trying to pull an apple.[/citation]
ReadyBoost is a cache of (part of) the page file. It does not replace the page file. Doing the latter would be potentially fatal to a running session if the drive was removed during operation, which is why no operating system uses removable drives for swap space. Although it is almost certainly possible for, say, Linux to add removable drives as swap.
 

back_by_demand

Splendid
BANNED
Jul 16, 2009
4,821
0
22,780
[citation][nom]theTwiz[/nom]so they want to patent putting a pagefile/swap on any external device? m$ is trying to pull an apple.[/citation]
By any chance, do you know who owns the patent for the pagefile / swapfile, because if it is also Microsoft then implementation of the same idea using an external device is perfectly valid.
...
Can anyone check this out?
 

hoof_hearted

Distinguished
Mar 6, 2010
349
0
18,780
[citation][nom]blazorthon[/nom]This doesn't seem very fair to non-M$ machines but really, how often is readyboost used, let alone a similar program in a different OS?After a quick Google search I'm not sure the page/swap file is even patented.[/citation]

I am sure Apple is working on that.
 

shafe88

Distinguished
Jul 6, 2010
854
1
19,015
[citation][nom]hoof_hearted[/nom]I am sure Apple is working on that.[/citation]
If that's the case than it all comes down to who bribes the patent office with the most $$$$$.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Hopefully it's not broad enough that is granted, would cover all caching. Otherwise what's the point as SSD's move mainstream. Cameras that buffer to RAM before writing to the Flash memory would fall under it, and well nearly all the smart phones that have RAM/CPU Cache. The CPU has caches already Intel would probably get mad.
 

alidan

Splendid
Aug 5, 2009
5,303
0
25,780
anyone use this with skyrim? i hear that it makes loading almost instant... not verified by me, but just what i hear.

if its true, i know the present ill give my little brother for christmass.
 
G

Guest

Guest
They should not be able to patent anything the can't explain. In 18 comments there are at least 5 takes on ReadyBoost.

7 years and they still have not explained it enough to choose to use it. Let's patent lint.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.