Mobile Bartons: any perf enhancements over regular Bartons?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

I'm just curious if the Mobile Barton is in any way better than the
regular Bartons (aside from power/heat considerations).
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

"Wblane" <wblane@aol.combotizer> wrote in message
news:20040509190451.09334.00000157@mb-m01.aol.com...
> I'm just curious if the Mobile Barton is in any way better than the
> regular Bartons (aside from power/heat considerations).

No.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

Oxford Systems wrote:
> "Wblane" <wblane@aol.combotizer> wrote in message
> news:20040509190451.09334.00000157@mb-m01.aol.com...
>
>>I'm just curious if the Mobile Barton is in any way better than the
>>regular Bartons (aside from power/heat considerations).
>
>
> No.
>
>

Yes. Easier to overclock.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

Bitstring <20040509190451.09334.00000157@mb-m01.aol.com>, from the
wonderful person Wblane <wblane@aol.combotizer> said
>I'm just curious if the Mobile Barton is in any way better than the
>regular Bartons (aside from power/heat considerations).

I believe the mobile chips may still be sold unlocked, but that's about
all. Only of any interest (along with the lower operating power) if you
plan to over clock.

--
GSV Three Minds in a Can
Outgoing Msgs are Turing Tested,and indistinguishable from human typing.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

On 09 May 2004 23:04:51 GMT, wblane@aol.combotizer (Wblane) wrote:
>I'm just curious if the Mobile Barton is in any way better than the
>regular Bartons (aside from power/heat considerations).

The AthlonXP-M Barton chips have slightly different specifications
from their desktop counterparts, though whether they are faster or
slower depends on the specific app you run.

The desktop Barton chips all use 333 or 400MT/s bus speeds, while the
mobile Barton chips are use 266MT/s bus speeds. On the flip side, the
mobile chips run at slightly higher clock speeds. For example, a
desktop AthlonXP 2500+ runs at 1.83GHz with a 333MT/s bus speed. The
mobile AthlonXP-M 2500+ runs at 1.86GHz with a 266MT/s bus speed.

In all the performance difference between the two won't amount to
much, some apps might be a tiny bit faster on one chip, other apps a
tiny bit faster on the other. On average I would probably give the
nod to the desktop chip as being the faster part, though you aren't
likely to notice the difference.

-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca