Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
> How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>
Help me please!!
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
> How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>
Help me please!!
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
menu boy wrote:
> "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
>
>>How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>>
>
> Help me please!!
Providing a little more information would seem wise if you want help.
menu boy wrote:
> "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
>
>>How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>>
>
> Help me please!!
Providing a little more information would seem wise if you want help.
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iwOtd.250$eO5.47@trndny08...
>
> "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
> > How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
> >
> Help me please!!
>
RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
Rich
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iwOtd.250$eO5.47@trndny08...
>
> "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
> > How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
> >
> Help me please!!
>
RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
Rich
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
"Kish" <Kish_K@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:exOtd.56462$QJ3.21491@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> menu boy wrote:
> > "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
> >
> >>How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
> >>
> >
> > Help me please!!
>
> Providing a little more information would seem wise if you want help.
RCV: Indeed! Its like posts that ask "Where can I find that big sword,
the one that does all the damage? Thanks peeps..."
I'm not even sure if its a mod for BG1 or BG2 that they are asking
about.... :-(
Rich
"Kish" <Kish_K@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:exOtd.56462$QJ3.21491@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> menu boy wrote:
> > "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07...
> >
> >>How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
> >>
> >
> > Help me please!!
>
> Providing a little more information would seem wise if you want help.
RCV: Indeed! Its like posts that ask "Where can I find that big sword,
the one that does all the damage? Thanks peeps..."
I'm not even sure if its a mod for BG1 or BG2 that they are asking
about.... :-(
Rich
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
>> > How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>> >
>> Help me please!!
>>
> RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
>
> Rich
lol - Things were so much simpler in the old days when there was only the OC
to worry about
Colin E
>> > How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>> >
>> Help me please!!
>>
> RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
>
> Rich
lol - Things were so much simpler in the old days when there was only the OC
to worry about
Colin E
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
Colin E wrote:
>>>>How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Help me please!!
>>>
>>
>> RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
>>
>> Rich
>
>
> lol - Things were so much simpler in the old days when there was only the OC
> to worry about
>
> Colin E
Why back in my day we didn't have any fancy 'mods'. If we wanted to
have a sorcerer in our party we had to *play* a sorcerer. And that's
the way we liked it!
And bugs! We had more typos and broken scripts then you could shake a
stick at. Forget about romancing Jaheira. One little petrification,
and poof, you were a two-timing, lant-gulping fininger-fanger she
wouldn't give the time of day to. And that's the way we liked it!
Why I remember back then playing a kensi/mage dual wielding Crom Faeyr
and Celestial Fury (which was the style of the day) thinking 'why the
heck were a bunch of goons hanging out in this Guarded Compound holding
these stupid empty flasks and this Rogue's Stone I can't even sell'?
And that's the way we liked it!
You kids with your fancy 'tab' key and your la-de-da overhead map that
shows the party moving. Bah!
MSH
Colin E wrote:
>>>>How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Help me please!!
>>>
>>
>> RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
>>
>> Rich
>
>
> lol - Things were so much simpler in the old days when there was only the OC
> to worry about
>
> Colin E
Why back in my day we didn't have any fancy 'mods'. If we wanted to
have a sorcerer in our party we had to *play* a sorcerer. And that's
the way we liked it!
And bugs! We had more typos and broken scripts then you could shake a
stick at. Forget about romancing Jaheira. One little petrification,
and poof, you were a two-timing, lant-gulping fininger-fanger she
wouldn't give the time of day to. And that's the way we liked it!
Why I remember back then playing a kensi/mage dual wielding Crom Faeyr
and Celestial Fury (which was the style of the day) thinking 'why the
heck were a bunch of goons hanging out in this Guarded Compound holding
these stupid empty flasks and this Rogue's Stone I can't even sell'?
And that's the way we liked it!
You kids with your fancy 'tab' key and your la-de-da overhead map that
shows the party moving. Bah!
MSH
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate (More info?)
"Colin E" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:41b89d16$0$1062$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
> >> > How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
> >> >
> >> Help me please!!
> >>
> > RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
> >
> > Rich
>
> lol - Things were so much simpler in the old days when there was only the OC
> to worry about
>
A simple google search with "forest of the forgotten souls" did the trick.
"Colin E" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:41b89d16$0$1062$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
> >> > How do you get into the forest of the forgotten souls areas?
> >> >
> >> Help me please!!
> >>
> > RCV: Uhh... mentioning the mod you are playing might help here. 🙂
> >
> > Rich
>
> lol - Things were so much simpler in the old days when there was only the OC
> to worry about
>
A simple google search with "forest of the forgotten souls" did the trick.
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate,news.admin.net-abuse.email (More info?)
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:5d7fe.4068-bH1.131@trndny08...
> was obstructed by two of the CIA's most potent allies:
> the major media and friendly public figures. In the latter
> category, Olmsted especially highlights the deadly role of Henry
> Kissinger. But as Victor Marchetti revealed to me, there was also
> something else at work behind the scenes. In an interview in his
> son's office in 1993, Marchetti told me that he never really
> thought the Agency was in danger at that time. He stated that
> first, the CIA had infiltrated the staff of Church's committee
> and, second, the Agency was intent on giving up documents only in
> certain areas. In Watergate terminology, it was a "limited-
> hangout" solution to the problem of controlling the damage.
>
> The Escape Route
>
> The issue that had ignited so much public interest in the
> hearings had been that of assassination. CIA Director Bill Colby
> very clearly drew the line that the CIA had never plotted such
> things domestically. Colby's admission was a brilliant tactical
> stroke that was not appreciated until much later. First, it put
> the focus on the plots against foreign leaders that could be
> explained as excesses of anti-communist zealotry (which is
> precisely what the drafters of Church's report did). Second, all
> probes into the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK would be off-
> limits. The Church Committee would now concentrate on the
> performance of the intelligence community in investigating the
> death of JFK; not complicity in the assassination itself. This
> distinction was crucial. As Colby must have understood, the
> Agency and its allies could ride out exposure of plots against
> Marxists and villains like Castro, Patrice Lumumba of the Congo
> and Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic. The exposure of
> domestic plots aga
Thanks for the troll. I didn't know I had so many fans.
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:5d7fe.4068-bH1.131@trndny08...
> was obstructed by two of the CIA's most potent allies:
> the major media and friendly public figures. In the latter
> category, Olmsted especially highlights the deadly role of Henry
> Kissinger. But as Victor Marchetti revealed to me, there was also
> something else at work behind the scenes. In an interview in his
> son's office in 1993, Marchetti told me that he never really
> thought the Agency was in danger at that time. He stated that
> first, the CIA had infiltrated the staff of Church's committee
> and, second, the Agency was intent on giving up documents only in
> certain areas. In Watergate terminology, it was a "limited-
> hangout" solution to the problem of controlling the damage.
>
> The Escape Route
>
> The issue that had ignited so much public interest in the
> hearings had been that of assassination. CIA Director Bill Colby
> very clearly drew the line that the CIA had never plotted such
> things domestically. Colby's admission was a brilliant tactical
> stroke that was not appreciated until much later. First, it put
> the focus on the plots against foreign leaders that could be
> explained as excesses of anti-communist zealotry (which is
> precisely what the drafters of Church's report did). Second, all
> probes into the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK would be off-
> limits. The Church Committee would now concentrate on the
> performance of the intelligence community in investigating the
> death of JFK; not complicity in the assassination itself. This
> distinction was crucial. As Colby must have understood, the
> Agency and its allies could ride out exposure of plots against
> Marxists and villains like Castro, Patrice Lumumba of the Congo
> and Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic. The exposure of
> domestic plots aga
Thanks for the troll. I didn't know I had so many fans.
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate,news.admin.net-abuse.email (More info?)
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:5d7fe.4068-bH1.131@trndny08...
> was obstructed by two of the CIA's most potent allies:
> the major media and friendly public figures. In the latter
> category, Olmsted especially highlights the deadly role of Henry
> Kissinger. But as Victor Marchetti revealed to me, there was also
> something else at work behind the scenes. In an interview in his
> son's office in 1993, Marchetti told me that he never really
> thought the Agency was in danger at that time. He stated that
> first, the CIA had infiltrated the staff of Church's committee
> and, second, the Agency was intent on giving up documents only in
> certain areas. In Watergate terminology, it was a "limited-
> hangout" solution to the problem of controlling the damage.
>
> The Escape Route
>
> The issue that had ignited so much public interest in the
> hearings had been that of assassination. CIA Director Bill Colby
> very clearly drew the line that the CIA had never plotted such
> things domestically. Colby's admission was a brilliant tactical
> stroke that was not appreciated until much later. First, it put
> the focus on the plots against foreign leaders that could be
> explained as excesses of anti-communist zealotry (which is
> precisely what the drafters of Church's report did). Second, all
> probes into the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK would be off-
> limits. The Church Committee would now concentrate on the
> performance of the intelligence community in investigating the
> death of JFK; not complicity in the assassination itself. This
> distinction was crucial. As Colby must have understood, the
> Agency and its allies could ride out exposure of plots against
> Marxists and villains like Castro, Patrice Lumumba of the Congo
> and Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic. The exposure of
> domestic plots aga
Oh, and BTW, you really need to pay attention to headers:
Path:
nwrdny01.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!news.glorb.com!news.t
ele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: mod question
Newsgroups: alt.games.baldurs-gate
References: <MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07> <iwOtd.250$eO5.47@trndny08> <FeStd.444909$Pl.195948@pd7tw1no>
<41b89d16$0$1062$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:41:37 GMT
Message-ID: <5d7fe.4068-bH1.131@trndny08>
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
X-Newsreader: PostXpert (www.postxpert.com)
Lines: 33
Organization: TDC Totalloesninger
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.217.218
X-Trace: 1102807016 dread15.news.tele.dk 9384 80.62.217.218:34816
X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk
Xref: cyclone1.gnilink.net alt.games.baldurs-gate:45704
X-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:16:56 EST (nwrdny01.gnilink.net)
"menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:5d7fe.4068-bH1.131@trndny08...
> was obstructed by two of the CIA's most potent allies:
> the major media and friendly public figures. In the latter
> category, Olmsted especially highlights the deadly role of Henry
> Kissinger. But as Victor Marchetti revealed to me, there was also
> something else at work behind the scenes. In an interview in his
> son's office in 1993, Marchetti told me that he never really
> thought the Agency was in danger at that time. He stated that
> first, the CIA had infiltrated the staff of Church's committee
> and, second, the Agency was intent on giving up documents only in
> certain areas. In Watergate terminology, it was a "limited-
> hangout" solution to the problem of controlling the damage.
>
> The Escape Route
>
> The issue that had ignited so much public interest in the
> hearings had been that of assassination. CIA Director Bill Colby
> very clearly drew the line that the CIA had never plotted such
> things domestically. Colby's admission was a brilliant tactical
> stroke that was not appreciated until much later. First, it put
> the focus on the plots against foreign leaders that could be
> explained as excesses of anti-communist zealotry (which is
> precisely what the drafters of Church's report did). Second, all
> probes into the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK would be off-
> limits. The Church Committee would now concentrate on the
> performance of the intelligence community in investigating the
> death of JFK; not complicity in the assassination itself. This
> distinction was crucial. As Colby must have understood, the
> Agency and its allies could ride out exposure of plots against
> Marxists and villains like Castro, Patrice Lumumba of the Congo
> and Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic. The exposure of
> domestic plots aga
Oh, and BTW, you really need to pay attention to headers:
Path:
nwrdny01.gnilink.net!cycny02.gnilink.net!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!news.glorb.com!news.t
ele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "menu boy" <ilSTOPITmobix@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: mod question
Newsgroups: alt.games.baldurs-gate
References: <MiTsd.9531$ZK6.3940@trndny07> <iwOtd.250$eO5.47@trndny08> <FeStd.444909$Pl.195948@pd7tw1no>
<41b89d16$0$1062$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:41:37 GMT
Message-ID: <5d7fe.4068-bH1.131@trndny08>
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
X-Newsreader: PostXpert (www.postxpert.com)
Lines: 33
Organization: TDC Totalloesninger
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.217.218
X-Trace: 1102807016 dread15.news.tele.dk 9384 80.62.217.218:34816
X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk
Xref: cyclone1.gnilink.net alt.games.baldurs-gate:45704
X-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:16:56 EST (nwrdny01.gnilink.net)
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate,news.admin.net-abuse.email (More info?)
menu boy wrote:
[snip dippy flood]
>
>
> Oh, and BTW, you really need to pay attention to headers:
>
It wouldn't hurt you too, either, specifically...
> Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Which is the key to the post you replied to. It was posted as part of
an attack against nanae by an entity known as "Hipcrime" or "Dippy"
(presumed to be a spanked spammer.) It was posting its floods directly
to nanae, but because it was being filtered out, has now taken to
posting to many groups all over Usenet, with Followups-To set to nanae,
with the (apparent) aim of flooding nanae with "WTF?" and "I didn't send
that" posts. The best thing you can do is to complain to the ISP of the
proxy it was abusing, or just ignore it. If you must reply to its
posts, *please* edit the Newsgroups line to avoid posting to nanae.
See http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml#newsgroup_attacks or google
for "Hipcrime" or "Dippy" for more info.
Andrew
menu boy wrote:
[snip dippy flood]
>
>
> Oh, and BTW, you really need to pay attention to headers:
>
It wouldn't hurt you too, either, specifically...
> Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Which is the key to the post you replied to. It was posted as part of
an attack against nanae by an entity known as "Hipcrime" or "Dippy"
(presumed to be a spanked spammer.) It was posting its floods directly
to nanae, but because it was being filtered out, has now taken to
posting to many groups all over Usenet, with Followups-To set to nanae,
with the (apparent) aim of flooding nanae with "WTF?" and "I didn't send
that" posts. The best thing you can do is to complain to the ISP of the
proxy it was abusing, or just ignore it. If you must reply to its
posts, *please* edit the Newsgroups line to avoid posting to nanae.
See http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml#newsgroup_attacks or google
for "Hipcrime" or "Dippy" for more info.
Andrew
Archived from groups: alt.games.baldurs-gate,news.admin.net-abuse.email (More info?)
"AndrewR" <andrew@uk.co.andrewr.REVERSEME> wrote in message
news:GWXud.35540$up1.17358@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> menu boy wrote:
>
> [snip dippy flood]
> >
> >
> > Oh, and BTW, you really need to pay attention to headers:
> >
>
> It wouldn't hurt you too, either, specifically...
>
> > Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
>
> Which is the key to the post you replied to. It was posted as part of
> an attack against nanae by an entity known as "Hipcrime" or "Dippy"
> (presumed to be a spanked spammer.) It was posting its floods directly
> to nanae, but because it was being filtered out, has now taken to
> posting to many groups all over Usenet, with Followups-To set to nanae,
> with the (apparent) aim of flooding nanae with "WTF?" and "I didn't send
> that" posts. The best thing you can do is to complain to the ISP of the
> proxy it was abusing, or just ignore it. If you must reply to its
> posts, *please* edit the Newsgroups line to avoid posting to nanae.
> See http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml#newsgroup_attacks or google
> for "Hipcrime" or "Dippy" for more info.
>
> Andrew
Um, yes, thanks.
"AndrewR" <andrew@uk.co.andrewr.REVERSEME> wrote in message
news:GWXud.35540$up1.17358@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> menu boy wrote:
>
> [snip dippy flood]
> >
> >
> > Oh, and BTW, you really need to pay attention to headers:
> >
>
> It wouldn't hurt you too, either, specifically...
>
> > Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
>
> Which is the key to the post you replied to. It was posted as part of
> an attack against nanae by an entity known as "Hipcrime" or "Dippy"
> (presumed to be a spanked spammer.) It was posting its floods directly
> to nanae, but because it was being filtered out, has now taken to
> posting to many groups all over Usenet, with Followups-To set to nanae,
> with the (apparent) aim of flooding nanae with "WTF?" and "I didn't send
> that" posts. The best thing you can do is to complain to the ISP of the
> proxy it was abusing, or just ignore it. If you must reply to its
> posts, *please* edit the Newsgroups line to avoid posting to nanae.
> See http://www.spamfaq.net/terminology.shtml#newsgroup_attacks or google
> for "Hipcrime" or "Dippy" for more info.
>
> Andrew
Um, yes, thanks.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
Discussion What's your favourite video game you've been playing?- Started by amdfangirl
- Replies: 4K
-
News Intel showed up for consumers at the 'Consumer Electronics Show;' AMD didn’t- Started by Admin
- Replies: 73
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Question Xbox 360/PC or PS4 motherboard in an Xbox one. Mod and Ideas.
- Latest: DDenterprises
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram