Hello,
I am sure this question and similar questions have been asked time and time again, but a quick search didn't come up with my exact situation.
I have not upgraded my monitor in over 6 years and I am looking to upgrade. I currently have an ASUS VH236H, 24 in., 1080p, 2 ms response, 60 Hz monitor. I am going to be purchasing a GTX 1070 to replace my GTX 770 and figured it is time to upgrade the monitor.
I have tried to do my research in terms of 1080p vs 1440p and 60 Hz vs 144 Hz. My requirements for a new monitor is 24-27 in., 1080p minimum, and <2 ms response time. Obviously if I am going to stick with a 24 in. monitor I would want an upgrade of some form, so then 144 Hz would also be required.
I have come up with the following options:
ASUS VG248QE 24 1920x1080 <2ms 144 Hz 239.64
ASUS VG278HV 27 1920x1080 <2ms 144 Hz 305.07
ASUS PB277Q 27 2560x1440 <2ms 75 Hz 319.21
I tried to find a 1440p monitor with 144 Hz, but they were outside of what I want to spend at this time (I could buy two GPUs instead of one for the price of the 144 Hz 1440p monitors). I also don't think that would be a good choice for me because it seems like you would need to replace GPUs more often to keep the FPS above 144.
Right now I sit just over 2 ft. from my monitor and sometimes I lean in to just under 2 ft. I play a wide range of games, but I would say I care most about my performance in games like Battlefield. So I am willing to sacrifice a tiny bit of visual fidelity for performance. But I also don't want to play on low settings just to have insane FPS.
So I guess I have three questions to narrow down my selection:
-Does a 1440p 27 in. 75 Hz monitor look better than a 1080p 27 in. 144 Hz monitor at a view distance of 2 ft?
-With such a short view distance, would a 24 in. monitor still be better than even a 1440p 27 in. monitor?
-How critical is it to keep a 144 FPS with a 144 Hz monitor? Would the game look worse if I was at 102 FPS on a 144 Hz monitor vs. 102 FPS on a 60 Hz monitor?
Thank you in advance for any advice or comments!
I am sure this question and similar questions have been asked time and time again, but a quick search didn't come up with my exact situation.
I have not upgraded my monitor in over 6 years and I am looking to upgrade. I currently have an ASUS VH236H, 24 in., 1080p, 2 ms response, 60 Hz monitor. I am going to be purchasing a GTX 1070 to replace my GTX 770 and figured it is time to upgrade the monitor.
I have tried to do my research in terms of 1080p vs 1440p and 60 Hz vs 144 Hz. My requirements for a new monitor is 24-27 in., 1080p minimum, and <2 ms response time. Obviously if I am going to stick with a 24 in. monitor I would want an upgrade of some form, so then 144 Hz would also be required.
I have come up with the following options:
ASUS VG248QE 24 1920x1080 <2ms 144 Hz 239.64
ASUS VG278HV 27 1920x1080 <2ms 144 Hz 305.07
ASUS PB277Q 27 2560x1440 <2ms 75 Hz 319.21
I tried to find a 1440p monitor with 144 Hz, but they were outside of what I want to spend at this time (I could buy two GPUs instead of one for the price of the 144 Hz 1440p monitors). I also don't think that would be a good choice for me because it seems like you would need to replace GPUs more often to keep the FPS above 144.
Right now I sit just over 2 ft. from my monitor and sometimes I lean in to just under 2 ft. I play a wide range of games, but I would say I care most about my performance in games like Battlefield. So I am willing to sacrifice a tiny bit of visual fidelity for performance. But I also don't want to play on low settings just to have insane FPS.
So I guess I have three questions to narrow down my selection:
-Does a 1440p 27 in. 75 Hz monitor look better than a 1080p 27 in. 144 Hz monitor at a view distance of 2 ft?
-With such a short view distance, would a 24 in. monitor still be better than even a 1440p 27 in. monitor?
-How critical is it to keep a 144 FPS with a 144 Hz monitor? Would the game look worse if I was at 102 FPS on a 144 Hz monitor vs. 102 FPS on a 60 Hz monitor?
Thank you in advance for any advice or comments!