The panel arguments are basically silly as it's almost never done apples and apples. When we hear that IPS does better color, it's often less about IPS versus TN as it is about color depth. Yes, an 8 bit IPS (most common config) will do color reproduction better than your typical 6 bit TN. But the Swift is an 8 bit TN panel so will have just about the same ability to produce colors as an 8 pin IPS panel. Of course there are 10 bit IPS panels but having the discussion w/o including whether it's 6, 8 or 10 bit is not going to result in a reliable answer.
The Swift is a great monitor... a year ago it was **the** gaming monitor to have. But today, it's the XB270HU bprz whose price varies daily. Since my original post, it's gone from $720 to $899.95 on Amazon "home page" for this item.
Tho from one of the alternate sources, still cabn get it fir $720.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00UPVXDA8/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new
It's not the best gaming monitor because it is IPS ... it's the best gaming monitor because the combination of 144 Hz, G-Sync and ULMB combined, overcome the otherwise inherent lag and ghosting limitations of IPS when gaming.
Now with the Acer at $720, frankly I no longer see the Swift worth its original asking price of $795.... now I see it as $675 maybe. However, it's $895.99 on your site
http://www.tigerdirect.pr/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=9175893&CatId=2318
For $170, I think i would have amazon ship it to you....or contact TigerDirect.pr and ask them .... I don't see why they would have the 4k model and not the 1440p G-Sync model other than Acer having trouble keeping up with demand... perhaps it is just outta stock.