I've always been told for pc gaming, you would need a monitor over a TV because TV's cause input lag. While I understand the ms response time on tv's is way higher than monitors, how come consoles aren't effected? Or are they and I just didn't notice.
I have an Acer predator monitor at 144hz with g-sync that I spent a pretty penny on, but now that there are 55inch 4k HDR tv's in comparison of price, I'm wondering if I should have gone with that instead. I do both console and pc gaming.
So that's my question, besides g-sync and reaching over 60 fps, is there really a benefit of buying a high end monitor over a big 4k HDR tv?
I have an Acer predator monitor at 144hz with g-sync that I spent a pretty penny on, but now that there are 55inch 4k HDR tv's in comparison of price, I'm wondering if I should have gone with that instead. I do both console and pc gaming.
So that's my question, besides g-sync and reaching over 60 fps, is there really a benefit of buying a high end monitor over a big 4k HDR tv?