Montecito: 2x667/800Mhz FSB, 4xDDR2-667/800 FBDIMM

[Mephistopheles]

According to <A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18759" target="_new">the inquirer</A>, montecito, Intel's new dual-core montecito due to be launched roughly together with all the other dual-core products next year, will use dedicated 667Mhz front-side-busses for each processor, each with 128 bit width, for a total of 10.6GB/s bandwidth for each processor.

A hypothetical two-way montecito would then have four cores, 48MB cache, two 667Mhz (or possibly 800Mhz, if they can get it to work with that) FSBs and quad-channel DDR2-667 (at least) or DDR2-800 (probably depending on availability and evolution of DDR2). The quad DDR2-667 would be 21.2GB/s wide and DDR2-800 would be 25.6GB/s wide.

Quite a lot better than the simple 6.4GB/s for the whole system on a current four-CPU, four-core Itanium system!

I wonder if this idea will also drop to the Xeon lineup?...

 

[PukePile]

Cool...........


<A HREF="http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=682299587" target="_new">40k in aquamark 3
</A>
P4b2.4@2.8||1024mb DDR@392mhz||9800pro@420/740||Viewsonic UltraBrite 19"||Panisonic DVD-RW

 

[wolverinero79]

48MB of cache? I think my first hard drive was ~40 MB.

I'm just your average habitual smiler =D

 

[Ned_Flanders]

And the cost of this chip, surely a six digit sum?

_______________________
"In the US and A there are many jobs. For Men: Accountant, Life Guard, and Sportsman. For Women...Prostitute"

 

[Mephistopheles]

I think the best Montecito will clock at, say, anything between 2.2 and 2.5Ghz (possibly variable because of Pellston) and occupy the current state-of-the-art bin of something like US$4000. Which is a lot indeed, if it doesn't deliver the goods...

At least if they try to make Xeon compatible with this monster, the xeon would get some pretty nasty characteristics...