Question My Aimlabs 7 mice test results

Samduhman

Distinguished
Nov 21, 2016
71
7
18,545
UPFRONT NOTICE: I am in no way an expert when it comes to testing mouse accuracy nor did I spend hours testing so don't beat me up if my test is flawed. I'm not a paid youtube reviewer. It's just me goofing around one morning. :D

I was bored and happened to glance at the 4 gaming mice sitting on or near my mouse pad ready to go at a moments notice. So I decided to play around with Aimlabs and do some comparisons as I had just received a new FNATIC MAYA 8K mouse.

Things to consider when looking at the results

- My hands aren't that big so I prefer small mice.
- I have a Dell Alienware 34" widescreen AW3423DWF
- Saturn Pro Mouse pad
- Default DPI mouse settings were set at whatever I am comfortable at using the mouse in Windows and the majority of games with this monitor. Most of which are not first person shooters
- All mice were wireless except for the MX310 and M-UAE96 which I dug up out of my dozens of mice to do a comparison of old vs new mice (I'm assuming the old mice are around 400dpi. I couldn't change dpi on these 2 mice and they were to slow for my monitor. I had to increase mouse speed in Windows.)
- Aimlabs test was Reflexshot/Ultimate Which works as so. A target (ball) of a random size will pop-up anywhere on the screen. You have 1 second to shoot it before it disappears and a new random target and location replaces it. This goes on for about a minutes.
- I ran each mouse through the test 2 times eliminating the lowest score. I then did the same for 400DPI but went backwards through the mouse list. I took only one shot each second whether I hit the target or not.
- The "Try Hard" score was me rerunning the test with the same mouse 4 or 5 times straight at 400DPI after the initial test was completed and eliminating the lowest scores.


Gaming Mouse AimLab Test Results.JPG




Summary

- I was surprised to see my accuracy is much better at 400dpi than I thought. I always "assumed" 400dpi was way to low. Its definately felt that way when playing. I'll need to test this again in some FPSers
- I was also surprised at the Viper v2 Pro scores as it's a bit to big and not nearly as comfortable as the rest and a reason I've used it less than a day.
- What I considered a throw away mouse you receive with a new generic computer really surprised me. The HP M-UAE96 score was impressive compared to the "gaming" mice.
- During this test I quickly discovered or proved things I already knew. Find a mouse that's comfortable in your hand and just keep using it day in and day out and your kill/death ratio will improve. The old adage practice makes perfect.
- Getting into the zone and trying hard will also improve your score. To be totally up front. I did take a few breaks during the test and I had to take a mulligan and restart the test when sitting back down. I found I would miss the first 2 to 3 targets.
- Maybe we don't don't need a $100+ mouse after all to be a great flick shooter or sniper. (I've hid this thought in back of my head for many years but I don't like to let it out)"There is no way this $40 Logitech or Coolermaster is just as good as my $70/$80 mouse." ;)
- The HP M-UAE96 scores, still WOW! A throw away mouse or just mice under $30/$40 test comparison against expensive gaming mouse could be interesting but I have the time.


With all that and what I discovered during my test, I agree with Rocket Jump Ninjas conclusion from his Maya 8k review
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rdka-gxxpFw&t=205s
 
MX310 and M-UAE96 which I dug up out of my dozens of mice to do a comparison of old vs new mice (I'm assuming the old mice are around 400dpi. I couldn't change dpi on these 2 mice and they were to slow for my monitor. I had to increase mouse speed in Windows.)
Technically, MX310 from 2003 used the same Avago ADNS-S2020 sensor as the MX510 and G1 which is 800dpi native. Unfortunately 400dpi is default with Microsoft driver on MX310, and the last Mouseware driver that allows toggling to 800dpi mode was for Windows XP. The Setpoint drivers for Windows Vista and newer did not properly support 800dpi on the MX310.

Increasing mouse speed in Windows beyond the middle is interpolation, which will severely reduce accuracy.

Logitech also made the M-UAE96 but it was from the same era as the MX310 so may not have used the same sensor as their own office mice such as the earlier B58/BJ58 Wheel Mouse, which was 400dpi only. The MX300 from 2002 used the A2020 sensor which is 400dpi only (despite the box claiming 800dpi, which was interpolated) but considered way better than B58 because it supported 10g acceleration + could be overclocked to 1000Hz polling for 154" per second tracking. The MX310 cannot do this and as with the G1 can only perfectly do 66" per second (note though that G1 defaults to 800dpi with no driver while MX310 can only do this in XP)

MX518 from 2005 with A3080 sensor was true 1600dpi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samduhman

Samduhman

Distinguished
Nov 21, 2016
71
7
18,545
I'll add to my original post. Based on my hand size and claw grip I'll list the 5 gaming mice from this test in order of my favorite to hold.

1. Razer Cobra Pro
2. MZ1
3. Maya 8k
4. Pulsar x2h mini
5. Viper v2 Pro

3 and 4 could easily be a coin toss but the Maya gets extra points for being only a day old. :cool: