My HDD boots in around 30 seconds

Grizequiel

Reputable
Jan 8, 2016
37
0
4,530
Is this normal?
I've read articles about how SSDs would be "super fast" since they can boot in around 25 seconds so I'm really not sure if I'm going crazy and I do have an SSD or my HDD is unusually fast.
I've only filled around 250gb of my 1tb HDD if that helps.
 
That a very good boot time for for a HDD. The time it takes to boot up depends on a lot of different factors, hardware and settings. SSD's , when set up properly, can boot up in as little as 5 seconds.
 


So, would you say it is worth it to upgrade to an SSD considering my current boot time?


 
I wouldn't say it worth it just for quicker boot times, but for everyday use. Programs open almost instantaneously, installations and virus scans go much quicker, web pages load faster. I could never go back to just using HDD's. And the price has come down enough that it's reasonable to pick one up and use it for the OS and programs and use your existing HDD for storage.
 


Thanks, you've sold me!
I think I'll buy an SSD and use it as my main drive but keep my HDD for other files.
 
A hard drive boot time of 30 seconds is not bad at all and is much better than the very first Seagate 10MB (not GB) hard disk drive I purchased in 1985. Back then the operating system was DOS 2.0. It took forever to load and the drive was noisy.

Purchasing an ssd just to speed up boot time is not a good idea. There are way too many factors that affect boot time. Some of the factors have nothing to do with a drive. The first factor is the UEFI BIOS. On my personal rig I can go into the UEFI BIOS and set how many seconds I want the BIOS screen to appear on my monitor screen. When it is set at 1 second there isn't enough time to see the 4 options I have for certain BIOS functions. I had to change it to display the info for 5 seconds because I can't remember what each Function key is for. Another pc I have handles it a little different. In the UEFI BIOS there are 3 choices - regular, fast, and fastest BIOS startup. It is also possible to skip a few BIOS startup routines. So far this is just BIOS related.

Windows is another problem. There are too many versions of Windows and too many settings, and configurations. Users have been reporting all sorts of different startup times. One of the more interesting observations reported by users is that Windows 7 loads a little faster than Windows 10 on the same ssd and system.

I have a bit of a hard time relating to the desire for fast startup times. That's strictly a personal matter. I don't sit at a desk waiting for the pc to start. When I get up in the morning I go to my home office and turn on my pc. Then I go to the kitchen to get a freshly brewed cup of coffee. By the time I get back to the home office the desktop is displayed on the monitor screen and Windows is waiting for me to type in a password. For me the startup time is irrelevant. There is also the question of just how much time is saved with a fast bootup. Quite a few consumers are reporting startup times between 15 and 23 seconds. At 15 seconds one could say that boot time with an ssd is twice as fast as your hard drive. However, what is the real savings? it is only about 15 seconds per day. At 15 seconds per day that works out to 91.25 minutes per year. I use more time just getting my coffee every morning.

Purchase an ssd for an overall increase in performance rather than just quick startups. Typically consumers will use an ssd for the operaing system, drivers, utilities, software applications, and some favorite games. Use a hard disk drive to store data files, movies, videos, photos, music, more games, and backups.

I maintain an ssd database listed in a sticky at the very top of this forum section. Here is the link:

http://www.johnnylucky.org/data-storage/ssd-database.html

Once you determine what type(s) of ssd's your motherboard can support, check the apropriate section of the ssd database for brands and models you might be interested in. Follow the links to the technical reviews. The reviews are divided into 2 categories - English language reviews and reviews in many other languages.
 


BadActor - I do not agree that Internet web pages load faster with an ssd. Most consumers are totally at the mercy of their Internet service providers and connections along the way to a destination. I am stuck with Cox Cable and copper cables in my neighborhood. No fiber optics for me. In addition the advertised high speed download times rarely happen when I measure. Cox gaves themselves an out by stating that high speed downloads are not always available. In my case the high speed access is almost never available. The delay has nothing to do with an ssd.
 
I can assure you, replacing the HDD in an aging laptop recently made a huge improvement in loading times. I don't know the exact technical reason why it made such a difference, but I suspect it had something to do with the lower latency when accessing cached data.
 
BadActor - minor misunderstanding. I meant sometimes there are delays in accessing a web page hosted on a server halfway around the world. Sometimes when I click on a link to a web site there is a delay in accessing and transmitting the requested web page to my pc. In the Internet Explorer tab a message appears saying "waiting for xyz.com". Once my pc receives the data then things move along at a fast clip.