my oc'd 2600 vs 3200

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

My 2600+ Barton --- 2.222 GHz - 193 FSB

Stock 3200+ Barton --- 2.200 GHz - 200 FSB

I know that a higher FSB is supposed to increase performance, but is the
extra 22 MHz I was able to crank out enough to overcome the 7 FSB advantage
a real 3200+ Barton has? There 3000+ Barton has less MHz and a 166 FSB,
while the 3200+ has 200FSB and AMD only sees it as a 200 ratings difference,
so I'm guessing mine could be as good or better, right?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:54:20 -0500, Jack Spungo wrote:

> My 2600+ Barton --- 2.222 GHz - 193 FSB
>
> Stock 3200+ Barton --- 2.200 GHz - 200 FSB
>
> I know that a higher FSB is supposed to increase performance, but is the
> extra 22 MHz I was able to crank out enough to overcome the 7 FSB advantage
> a real 3200+ Barton has? There 3000+ Barton has less MHz and a 166 FSB,
> while the 3200+ has 200FSB and AMD only sees it as a 200 ratings difference,
> so I'm guessing mine could be as good or better, right?

At the same speed, the 193 to 200 difference would acount for a
performance boost of about 0.8%, so 2218MHz would put them about on par.
You're a little over that. Now does this really matter that nuch.🙂

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

It guess it shouldn't, but it does to me. Great news, thanks for that.

"Wes Newell" <w.newell@TAKEOUTverizon.net> wrote in message
news😛an.2004.12.07.11.39.40.249132@TAKEOUTverizon.net...
> On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:54:20 -0500, Jack Spungo wrote:
>
>> My 2600+ Barton --- 2.222 GHz - 193 FSB
>>
>> Stock 3200+ Barton --- 2.200 GHz - 200 FSB
>>
>> I know that a higher FSB is supposed to increase performance, but is the
>> extra 22 MHz I was able to crank out enough to overcome the 7 FSB
>> advantage
>> a real 3200+ Barton has? There 3000+ Barton has less MHz and a 166 FSB,
>> while the 3200+ has 200FSB and AMD only sees it as a 200 ratings
>> difference,
>> so I'm guessing mine could be as good or better, right?
>
> At the same speed, the 193 to 200 difference would acount for a
> performance boost of about 0.8%, so 2218MHz would put them about on par.
> You're a little over that. Now does this really matter that nuch.🙂
>
> --
> Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm