Need advice: PCIe SSD vs SSD in Raid 0

Bearo

Distinguished
Jul 11, 2011
34
0
18,530
Hello all,

I was set on getting the Asus ROG Raidr Express 240GB PCI Express SSD card until I started reading many reviews/user comments online about how PCIe SSD cards aren't suitable for gaming/PC setups due to being good at high performance queuing but not in small data or something like that (I'm not SSD/HDD expert).

I was mainly after a very fast, bootable SSD drive that I could use from apps/windows/gaming. I wanted to use the Asus ROG Raidr for this but now I'm a little perturbed by these findings.

I watched a review comparison by Linus (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAQOVI6Q1wo) where you ran tests on two PCIe cards, one a consumer card and the other an enterprise level card, as well as having a Samsung 840 Evo SSD and two other SSD's (SP920's) in Raid 0 all benchmarked against each other.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8odk7JUmPjIZC1ZOF8xaGxjM00/edit

I was quite surprised (and disappointed) to see the PCIe card score so low. However, seeing the SP920 SSD's (in Raid 0) hitting Read speeds of 1Gb/s in nearly all the tests made me wonder. These cards are really quite low-end compared to the 840 Evo (even the basic Evo). I could get 4 Samsung 840 Evo 240GB Basic SSD's and put them in Raid 0, and should get fairly decent speeds, right?

These drives are £79.99 each. If confirmed, I could have 1Tb storage and potentially faster SSD's for less than the Asus ROG Raidr.

If someone can confirm or deny my assumptions that would be great.

Thanks
 
Yeah, just finished reading that.. interesting stuff. Even though the article leans towards saying solo drives are probably better suited to the average PC/enthusiast I think I'm still going to try the 250GB 840's on Raid 0.
 
Yes, that's true, but if all I plan to install on it is the OS and apps I'm not that worried. I have 4Tb's of storage for personal files, music and what not on my SATA drives.