Need help choosing EVGA GTX 750 vs 750 Ti

[nismoguy82]

I was ready to get the EVGA GTX 750 Ti 2Gb Superclocked, until EVGA updated the NON Ti GTX 750 with a 2Gb Superclocked version. Now, the Non Ti has a better base and boost clock for $20-$30 less than the Ti. I just don't know how the difference in CUDA cores and memory bandwidth/speed would affect gaming performance.

GTX 750 NON Ti:

Performance
NVIDIA GTX 750
512 CUDA Cores
1215 MHz Base Clock
1294 MHz Boost Clock

Memory
2048 MB, 128 bit GDDR5
5012 MHz (effective)
80 GB/s Memory Bandwidth

GTX 750 Ti:

Performance
NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti
640 CUDA Cores
1176 MHz Base Clock
1255 MHz Boost Clock

Memory
2048 MB, 128 bit GDDR5
5400 MHz (effective)
86.4 GB/s Memory Bandwidth

This will going into an OEM PC with no plans to do any further overclocking whatsoever, mainly for BF4.

 

[unknownofprob]

GTX 750Ti in my opinion a better choice and worth the extra cost.

 

[getochkn]

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7764/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-and-gtx-750-review-maxwell/14 750 vs 750ti BF4 benchmarks.........

 

[nismoguy82]

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7764/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-and-gtx-750-review-maxwell/14 750 vs 750ti BF4 benchmarks.........

Their stock clocks are lower than the EVGA's, but are comparable after overclocking. With that, it seems that the non-Ti 750 is still lacking compared to the Ti, because of the fewer CUDA cores. So, the Ti will still out perform the non-Ti due to more CUDA cores, even if it's slightly lower clocked? Sorry, I'm totally new to this PC gaming realm.

 

[unknownofprob]

yes the Ti will outperform the non-Ti, more CUDA cores is often better and in this case yes, Doesn't always matter on the GPU clock, but it can, in this case no it doesn't.