dstiffler94 :
I think I am going to go with the Evolv ATX TG case and the H100i V2. In that particular case would I have sufficient room for a push/pull setup on the rad? If so I could do as you said with having the default corsair fans on the hidden side, the ML corsair fans on the exposed side, another corsair fan on the rear slot and 2 fans in the front, which i can always change out later if the off color annoys me.
If you ever decide to install the H100i V2 on top (as exhaust) in the Evolv ATX TG, the 120mm fans would have a clearance of 68mm away (measured horizontally) from the motherboard. Your current Corsair Vengenace RAMs would not be an obstruction. Although, aesthetically and subjectively, the total thickness of this push/pull setup *might* not be to your liking as the lower fans will cover portions of said RAMs, visually. The fans, usually at 25mm thick each, plus the rad at 30mm thick, will have a total thickness of 80mm (measured vertically) from the top radiator tray. Installing thinner/low-profile fans might be an option (I am not sure if 12mm fans can fit between the rad tray and the chassis top cover though) *or* you can just revert to a push OR pull setup if the push/pull will not be aestically pleasing for you given the total thickness.
Some setups do a front rad placement for a push/pull setup (as there is more space clearance in that location. But as I said, the tubing length/twisting concerns might be a problem, especially that the H100i V2 has thick and less flexible tubing as compared with other versions.
Here's a sample setup of the case and the cooler with the fans (the AIO is in a Push Top Exhaust in this example):
Source:
http://pcpartpicker.com/b/yZBPxr
Here is another example, a video/review of the H100i V2 installed in the Evolv ATX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEFVUV0FGow
dstiffler94 :
I still have a few questions haha bear with me. Shouldn't you have more intake than exhaust or the same? Right now with the setup above I would have 280mm of fans doing intake and 360mm of fans doing exhaust is that bad?
Generally, most recommend a "positive pressure" airflow in the case, i.e., more air going in than going out. The main advantage of this is to counteract dust build-up because if more air is being exhausted, dust tends to creep in the small openings into your case. Having a "negative pressure" airflow is not a terrible thing per se, although most lean towards "positive pressure" due to its logical advantage.
It's not necessarily the quantity of fans (nor the size) that determines whether you have "positive" or "negative" airflow. It is actually the fan's design and the volume of air the fan provides, which is directly relative to the fan's rpm/speed. You can have just 1x 140mm intake fan but taking in more cfm airflow at a higher rpm compared to 4x 120mm fans exhausting less cfm airflow at a slower rpm and still have "positive pressure".
Note also that 2 fans in a Push/Pull setup are technically moving the same amount of air (but at a greater static pressure). So in the case of the 4x 120mm fans in Push/Pull configuration on a 240mm rad, they are technically just exhausting an airflow equal to "2x 120mm fans".
dstiffler94 :
Also fan control. My MB (MSI Z170 Gaming M5) only has two PWM headers. Would you connect one to the fan hub on the case to control the fans on the CPU cooler while keeping the other case fans on other headers, or should I do them all on the same header and control them with one PWM curve?
There are several ways to do it and I think it's only a matter of preference. Some would prefer the rad fans to be PWM-controlled while the rest of the case fans be plugged into DC/Voltage-controlled (in your case, your MB has 3x voltage-controlled headers) running at 100% (as lowering voltage does reduce fan speed but *might* result in a stalled fan which you don't want to happen). Some would prefer fans cooling the rad to be software-controlled (e.g., Corsair Link) and the rest of the fan BIOS-controlled.
Note that the pump block of the H100i v2 has a fan connector/splitter that can connect 2 fans (usually the 2 included fans of the 240mm AIO). Said fans connect directly at the pump block, which in turn connects to a MB header (usually the CPU_FAN) which acts as the AIO's main power source (no more SATA power or Molex connections). Some have tried connecting 2 extra splitters (that connects to the 2 heads of the included AIO splitter) in order to power 4 fans in Push/Pull (plus the pump) using just one MB header (but you have to check the pump and the fan's total current draw against the MB header, which is usually at 1A only). Your Corsair ML120 fan has a power draw of ~0.22A (or ~0.3A for the LED versions).
The Phanteks case also features a PWM fan hub (at the back) where you can connect additional fans. For the fan hub to work properly (in PWM), you must connect it to a true-PWM 4-pin header (not the 4-pin voltage-controlled headers). This means that if you are to utilize the hub's feature, given your current MB, you must only use 1 PWM header for the 4 rad fans and AIO pump (CPU_FAN1) so that the remaining PWM header (CPU_FAN2) will be for the hub's use.
One other usual and logical suggestion is to connect the AIO pump to a DC-controlled header, or via 4-pin molex adapter to PSU, to make it run at a constant 100% (as these AIO pumps are usually designed at non-variable speeds). The rad fans then connect to the CPU_FAN for PWM performance/monitoring, while the rest of the case fans can be connected to other available fan headers/hub. This might go against the manual (which specifies the AIO be connected to the CPU_FAN header, where it gets its power, and not directly via PSU) but installing it to other fan headers have worked for them as well (as long as you connect any other fan to the CPU_FAN header). Not sure if you can still monitor (or control) the AIO via CorsairLink though (probably not).
Generally it is best to have at least 2 separate PWM curves for all your cooling fans - one curve for set of fans based on CPU temps and one curve for set of fans based on motherboard temps.