need help selecting a CPU...dual core E6850 or quad core Q6600?

The_Andy

Distinguished
Dec 18, 2007
3
0
18,510
I'm looking at buying a new Dell 720 desktop, and am trying to decide between the 2 CPUs below:

Intel® Core™2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB)
Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6850 (4MB L2 Cache,3.0GHz,1333 FSB)

I'm looking for high performance now for games (probably the E6850), but could take slightly lower performance today (Q6600) if the quad core will bring me advantages tommorrow, when more games are multi-threaded.

Any advice? Dell's not currently offering the Q6700 in this machine, and I don't want to shell out the $$ for the Extreme CPUs.
 
yes ... the quad is a bit more future proof ... sounds like you have already done a bit of reading.

Make sure you get at least a 3850 graphics card or higher - a 3870, 8800GT, GTS, GTX.

Then you can actually game at a decent res.
 
How much are you paying for the rig? Get the q6600 since you'll have more options with multi-threaded applications/games later. I'm sure you can build you own for less than what Dell is having, but I'm not the one paying for it :) Yes, get at least a 3850,3870,8800gt and up for a decent gaming GPU.
 

Rolenio

Distinguished
Jul 20, 2007
58
0
18,630
q6600 is more than enough for any game and should be more futureproof. E6850 may be faster in some games but it doesn't really matter much in real life.
The way I see it, only downside of q6600 would be more heat/noise, but still nothing to worry about for most people.
 

nhobo

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2006
561
0
18,980
Advice (from one used to buy DELL): build your own. You'll get a better result, an upgradeble platform, *and* you'll learn how to maintain it yourself.
 

roadrunner197069

Splendid
Sep 3, 2007
4,416
0
22,780
Dont go Dell. Build your own or find someone like me to custom build to your needs.
Link to the Dell you want And I bet I could build one and overclock it to qx6850 speeds for less money.
 

LukeBird

Distinguished
Nov 14, 2007
654
0
18,980
If it was my money, I'd go against what the majority of people say and unless you're doing video/photo-editing or more importantly rendering, a dual-core for gaming is more than enough.
I think buy the time developers get around to making quad-core enabled programs/games the Q6600 is likely to be massively outclassed!
Remember how we were told we'd all be running 64-bit systems & programs, within a year, what, 3 years ago :D
Not to say I wouldn't upgrade my 6000+ if I thought a Phenom would give me more over the tasks I value from my processor (mostly gaming)
 

spoonboy

Distinguished
Oct 31, 2007
1,053
0
19,280
Go for the quad mate. Even in games that dont have that many threads going on, you'll then have in effect a 2.4ghz core 2 duo, which is more than suficient for gaming. Plus youve got the option to overclock later if you feel its lagging behind a bit, and 3.0ghz on air should be easy peasy. Think to the future! A quad will last you for years.
 

The_Andy

Distinguished
Dec 18, 2007
3
0
18,510


Below is what I'm currently spec'ing from Dell.....it's around $3400 plus tax (I get a small discount through work). I'd love any feedback on the options I've selected. Specifically, anyone know of any issues with running the Raid 0 harddrives? We run that config at work on high end Dell 690 workstations, and the HD performance kicks butt. I don't want any compatibility problems with any software utilities (defrag, backup, partioning, etc).


Dell XPS 720 - Red
Intel® Core™2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB)
Genuine Windows Vista® Ultimate (32bit)
3GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz - 4 DIMMs
320GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 160GB WD Raptor SATA 1.5Gb/s 10,000 RPM HDDs)
Dual Drives: 16x DVD-ROM Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ dbl layer write capable
24 inch UltraSharp™ 2407WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
768MB Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX
Sound Blaster® X-Fi™ XtremeGamer (D) Sound Card
Dell USB Enhanced Multimedia Keyboard
Razer Copperhead Tempest Blue Gaming Mouse (ships separately)
Dell WL6000 5.8GHz Wireless Rear 5.1 Speaker System with Subwoofer


the E6850 CPU is about $50 more than the Q6600

I'm not really interested at this point in building my own or having one custom built by someone. I've had excellent experience with Dell PCs (the last 2 have run for 8yrs and 4 yrs without a hiccup).
 

The_Andy

Distinguished
Dec 18, 2007
3
0
18,510


4gb is an option, but 32bit windows can only use 3gb. need 64bit windows to access more memory
 

Wow!!! $3400???? I'd love to spend that on a system, but I'd build myself the same performance for $2000 or less :) I'd question the 3gb w/4dimm's, I'm thinking that they are saying 3gb with 4 dimm slots with maybe 2 or 4 of the slots taken up, but that is just a guess. The only other thing that jumps out at me is the 8800gtx. I'd opt for a 8800gt if there was that option. It'll run cooler and generally quieter than a 8800gtx and be pretty much the same performance. It'll also be about 1/2 the price too :) With the setup that you have picked, I'd probably not get the wireless speaker system, since I'm sure it's quite spendy. If you really need it than get it, but I don't know if I'd get it. If that option isn't too much than by all means get what you want. Most of the time when I'm gaming I use a headset and don't need the use of speakers, so that's where I'm coming from, on the speaker issue. Get what you like, I'm just pointing out things to think about. As far as the CPU for gaming goes, I'd find it hard to spend $50 more for the e6850 over the q6600, IMHO. One other thing, since your getting a Raptor HD already, just get a larger 2nd HD (like 320-500gig) for your storage. I think the raptors now are just overrated and over priced for what you get for desktop applications. I don't know how well workstations do with RAID, but you would know that better than me.
 

roadrunner197069

Splendid
Sep 3, 2007
4,416
0
22,780
You'll be paying slightly less then double what you could build it for. You could build it around $1700.00 Or I could build it for you and OC it to 3.5 for $2300. A dell wont be overclockable.
 

Yeah, but will you support it for 1-3 years? He says that he doesn't want to build it or have someone build it for him. I just don't like to see $1k go down the drain. Most people salivate over the thought of building a system close to $1k, so you can see where I'm coming from there. Oh well, if he wants to buy a Dell, let him do it. It's his $.
 

quantumsheep

Distinguished
Dec 10, 2005
2,341
0
19,790
I myself think there's nothing wrong with Dell. I bought a laptop from the a while ago and the customer care has been great, certainly wouldn't have got that if i built it myself!

Fair enough, they cost a bit more but if you're not too good with technology they're great.
 

nhobo

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2006
561
0
18,980
The only part worth buying from Dell is the monitor.

Vista is crap. The GTX is expensive and obsolete. Raptors are HUGELY expensive and RAID0 is worthless in terms of performance. Who needs a $70 mouse?

Go ahead, throw away your money. Come to a builder's forum and ask about an overpriced prebuilt ... I could take 2 grand off that price, still have the 24" Dell monitor and have a kick-ass system.
 

night_wolf_in

Distinguished
Jan 7, 2007
702
0
18,980


be happy, u get ur salary+comissions because of dell. if i was in ur place. i would recommend dell higligy. :lol:
 

plguzman

Distinguished
Nov 14, 2006
337
0
18,780
I had some Dells in the past, but eventually I started to build my own systems, and now I'm not getting back. Building is easy, cheaper, the warranty is the same and the performance is far superior. If you get a laptop then you have to get a brand computer since a laptop can't be built yet, but in a desktop is a no brainer to me.

...oh and I kept the monitor from my last Dell lol.
 

slicessoul

Distinguished
Apr 18, 2006
771
0
18,980
What do you mean Chinese or Indoneise for support ?


 

roadrunner197069

Splendid
Sep 3, 2007
4,416
0
22,780

Actually you can get parts to build laptops, but they are hard to find and very expensive.
 

TRENDING THREADS