Hey all,
Yeah, long story short, my Dominator set doesn't work with the 8-8-8-24 timings @ 1704 MHz, I know this because Prime95 blend fails pretty fast. I changed to 9-9-9-24 and so far it's working pretty well. I'm curious though, would it be better to downclock to what would be about 1360 MHz and using lower timings with that setting, or am I better off using 1704 MHz with the 9-9-9-24 timings? Also wondering if I can get any better timings than 9-9-9-24.. I suspect no, since Prime failed at the rated timings for 1600 MHz very quickly on two threads (I didn't let it run any longer than that, there was no point).
Some background:
I originally increased my processor's base clock to 170 to get a 3.6 GHz overclock. I set the vcore to 1.2V and the uncore to 1.275V, and the dram to 1.66V. I ran Prime for 22.5 hours at small FTTs without a single error, so I was very happy with my CPU's performance. However, like I said, I tried doing the blend test and it failed within minutes. Initially I got a blue screen that blamed the tcpip.sys driver (a problem beyond the scope of this), and when I did something to hopefully fix that, I managed to get Prime running and it failed quickly. I ran 3 passes of memtest86 without any errors, so I figured the RAM was fine (curious since memtest was displaying that it was testing the modules at the 8-8-8-24 timings @ 1700 MHz and I got no errors..). Ran Prime again, it failed again, so I switched to the new timings and as I am typing this it is running without issues.
So yeah, quick summary, am I ok to keep these timings, maybe try to go for something like 8-8-9-24 and keep this overclock, or downclock and use stricter timings? I'm especially interested to hear from people that have practical experience with this particular set of RAM, but otherwise, any and all help is greatly appreciated.
Yeah, long story short, my Dominator set doesn't work with the 8-8-8-24 timings @ 1704 MHz, I know this because Prime95 blend fails pretty fast. I changed to 9-9-9-24 and so far it's working pretty well. I'm curious though, would it be better to downclock to what would be about 1360 MHz and using lower timings with that setting, or am I better off using 1704 MHz with the 9-9-9-24 timings? Also wondering if I can get any better timings than 9-9-9-24.. I suspect no, since Prime failed at the rated timings for 1600 MHz very quickly on two threads (I didn't let it run any longer than that, there was no point).
Some background:
I originally increased my processor's base clock to 170 to get a 3.6 GHz overclock. I set the vcore to 1.2V and the uncore to 1.275V, and the dram to 1.66V. I ran Prime for 22.5 hours at small FTTs without a single error, so I was very happy with my CPU's performance. However, like I said, I tried doing the blend test and it failed within minutes. Initially I got a blue screen that blamed the tcpip.sys driver (a problem beyond the scope of this), and when I did something to hopefully fix that, I managed to get Prime running and it failed quickly. I ran 3 passes of memtest86 without any errors, so I figured the RAM was fine (curious since memtest was displaying that it was testing the modules at the 8-8-8-24 timings @ 1700 MHz and I got no errors..). Ran Prime again, it failed again, so I switched to the new timings and as I am typing this it is running without issues.
So yeah, quick summary, am I ok to keep these timings, maybe try to go for something like 8-8-9-24 and keep this overclock, or downclock and use stricter timings? I'm especially interested to hear from people that have practical experience with this particular set of RAM, but otherwise, any and all help is greatly appreciated.
