soonerproud
Distinguished
[citation][nom]ta152h[/nom]Sooner, no offense, but you don't know anything about processors. The Phenom II is the same size as the i7, and doesn't even approach the performance of it. It's roughly as expensive to make, can not clock as high, and has much lower IPC. How is that anything but a bad design? AMD has to price them very low, and against Intel's previous generation. The problem is, they are losing money by doing so. It's because the bad design forces them to do this. It's so inferior to the i7, and as Intel moves the Nehalem mainstream it's going to get even tougher. The Phenom II can't even compete clock normalized with the Core 2, and it's a much larger chip. So, really, try to learn before you post.[/citation]
I am very aware of the deficiencies of AMD's processor design and don't need schooled on the subject. AMD is behind Intel on process technology, but considering the lack of resources compared to Intel the PHII is a very well designed processor. If AMD had Intel's resources, don't you think they would have these issues worked out already? Besides, AMD is not positioning these processors against Intel's high end. They are positioning them against the mainstream segment, which they are very competetive with.
One point you are incorrect on is in some areas the PHII does approach the i7 in performance. If AMD added SMT much like Intel's HT technology, it would be very competetive with the i7 in a lot more benchies.
You should be less condescending to people because they may know more than you think they do.
I am very aware of the deficiencies of AMD's processor design and don't need schooled on the subject. AMD is behind Intel on process technology, but considering the lack of resources compared to Intel the PHII is a very well designed processor. If AMD had Intel's resources, don't you think they would have these issues worked out already? Besides, AMD is not positioning these processors against Intel's high end. They are positioning them against the mainstream segment, which they are very competetive with.
One point you are incorrect on is in some areas the PHII does approach the i7 in performance. If AMD added SMT much like Intel's HT technology, it would be very competetive with the i7 in a lot more benchies.
You should be less condescending to people because they may know more than you think they do.