New AMD and Intel CPUs Surface on Valid.CanardPC

[RedundantInk]

CPU-Z Validator results posted on Valid.CanardPC may have revealed the AMD FX-8750, A10-5750, Intel Core i5-4200U “Haswell ULT” and i5-4850T processors

New AMD and Intel CPUs Surface on Valid.CanardPC : Read more

 

[patrick47018]

Can't wait to see more on these

 

[Someone Somewhere]

There's quite an easy way to confirm these are valid. Publish the damn ID numbers.
Time for someone to write a reverse lookup table other than the records one...

 

[InvalidError]

"i5-4850T"
I was expecting models over 4700 to be i7. Smells like more numbering scheme fail to me.

 

[sarinaide]

The AMD part is fake as it gets. 1) 8320 2) Asrock Crosshair V Formula (fail) and 3) HD8970 doesn't exist to test. Photoshopped.

 

[rolli59]

Looks like a overclocked FX8320 to me.

 

[swordrage]

Can somebody enlighten me where does intel hd440 graphics stand..
never heard of it

 

[mikenygmail]

The AMD 10-5750M APU with integrated Radeon HD 8650G graphics sounds amazing! Bring on the review!

 

[swordrage]

Now that I have actually read the "news" and the images...
WTF is this S***? heading i54670T, just below that, i5 4670K and one can go on and on...

 

[ojas]

What on earth is HD 440? 4400, surely.

 

[technoholic]

Now that I have actually read the "news" and the images...
WTF is this S***? heading i54670T, just below that, i5 4670K and one can go on and on...

Yea and FX 8750 vs FX 8570 )

 

[beta212]

I did post the links on that page, if people cared to check.....
Link to amd 8570 : http://valid.canardpc.com/2665708
Link to amd a10 5750m : http://valid.canardpc.com/2790699
Link to intel i7 4770k: http://valid.canardpc.com/2780204
Link to intel i5 4670k: http://valid.canardpc.com/2780198
Link 2: http://valid.canardpc.com/2717867
DEAD LINK Link 3: http://valid.canardpc.com/2725923

 

[sykozis]

The AMD part is fake as it gets. 1) 8320 2) Asrock Crosshair V Formula (fail) and 3) HD8970 doesn't exist to test. Photoshopped.

AMD may beg to differ on an HD8970 existing....as it does in fact exist...

http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/8000/Pages/8000-series.aspx#2

Doesn't match what Canard has listed....but it's still an HD8970.

 

[PreferLinux]

The AMD part is fake as it gets. 1) 8320 2) Asrock Crosshair V Formula (fail) and 3) HD8970 doesn't exist to test. Photoshopped.

AMD may beg to differ on an HD8970 existing....as it does in fact exist...

http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/8000/Pages/8000-series.aspx#2

Doesn't match what Canard has listed....but it's still an HD8970.

Hum, I'll just call that a 7970. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6570/amds-annual-gpu-rebadge-radeon-hd-8000-series-for-oems

 

[csf60]

So many random things in these screenshots to be considered legit. I myself have managed to make CPU-z tell my CPU is an engineering sample by opening it just the same second my desktop boots up.

 

[SkateZilla]

Considering teh CPU-Z still lists it as a FX8320!?,