Hello ladies and gentlemen,
I'm only marginally familiar with the finer points of system building; I built one machine from scratch several years ago, under the watchful supervision of a friend who's since moved away and can no longer provide guidance. I've upgraded most components since the system was originally built, and I think the time has come to finally replace my processor, due to mounting evidence that my GPU is not the be all, end all of gaming. My current system is:
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
MoBo: ASUS P5N-E SLI
Memory: 8gigs of GSkill 5-5-5-15 (I have no idea what those numbers mean)
GPU: ATI 5850 (ASUS EAH5850)
I have a Seagate 1TB hard drive and a Kingwin 730W power supply.
My preference would be to spend less than $300 for a new CPU and MoBo, or around $200 for just a CPU (for the record, "CPU Socket Type" is what you want to match when picking a compatible motherboard, right?). I would also like this to be the last upgrade I have to perform for at least 18 months. As I said, this machine will be mainly for gaming; I'm a math student, and there is only a very slight chance my thesis will involve any sort of computing. In particular, I play World of Warcraft, Modern Warfare 2, and Company of Heroes, if that helps the reckoning any.
After doing some research, I've mostly found that I'm rather hopelessly undereducated. In particular, I don't feel equipped to evaluate competing arguments on clock speed vs. more cores ("threading"?), and I don't follow evaluations of different chips at all. For example, a recent review mentioned both the Athlon II X3 and the Phenom II X3 as good values for their price point, but I can't for the life of me figure out what makes the Phenom more expensive (the athlon has a slightly higher stock clock speed, and they're both three cores and 4000 "Hyper Transports" [which is Greek to me]). For similar reasons, I don't understand why the i5-750 was recently rated the best ~$200 gaming CPU recently rated the best ~$200 gaming CPU over (for example) the i5-650, which is significantly faster (though only dual core). I was under the impression that more than two cores wasn't that great an advantage in gaming, because most games aren't built to take advantage of multiple cores.
Any advice on a CPU would be greatly appreciated, and if you can point out a fundamental assumption I'm getting wrong, even more so. Choosing among video cards was so much simpler; I feel like I'm back in highschool, lost in chemistry or something equally arcane. One real frustration is that the numbers on these chips that are being recommend don't seem to be that much different than my old 2.66Ghz dual core; which means I can't even tell the difference between chips that are separated by two years and who knows how many generations. Am I just looking at entirely the wrong set of numbers?
I'm only marginally familiar with the finer points of system building; I built one machine from scratch several years ago, under the watchful supervision of a friend who's since moved away and can no longer provide guidance. I've upgraded most components since the system was originally built, and I think the time has come to finally replace my processor, due to mounting evidence that my GPU is not the be all, end all of gaming. My current system is:
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.7GHz
MoBo: ASUS P5N-E SLI
Memory: 8gigs of GSkill 5-5-5-15 (I have no idea what those numbers mean)
GPU: ATI 5850 (ASUS EAH5850)
I have a Seagate 1TB hard drive and a Kingwin 730W power supply.
My preference would be to spend less than $300 for a new CPU and MoBo, or around $200 for just a CPU (for the record, "CPU Socket Type" is what you want to match when picking a compatible motherboard, right?). I would also like this to be the last upgrade I have to perform for at least 18 months. As I said, this machine will be mainly for gaming; I'm a math student, and there is only a very slight chance my thesis will involve any sort of computing. In particular, I play World of Warcraft, Modern Warfare 2, and Company of Heroes, if that helps the reckoning any.
After doing some research, I've mostly found that I'm rather hopelessly undereducated. In particular, I don't feel equipped to evaluate competing arguments on clock speed vs. more cores ("threading"?), and I don't follow evaluations of different chips at all. For example, a recent review mentioned both the Athlon II X3 and the Phenom II X3 as good values for their price point, but I can't for the life of me figure out what makes the Phenom more expensive (the athlon has a slightly higher stock clock speed, and they're both three cores and 4000 "Hyper Transports" [which is Greek to me]). For similar reasons, I don't understand why the i5-750 was recently rated the best ~$200 gaming CPU recently rated the best ~$200 gaming CPU over (for example) the i5-650, which is significantly faster (though only dual core). I was under the impression that more than two cores wasn't that great an advantage in gaming, because most games aren't built to take advantage of multiple cores.
Any advice on a CPU would be greatly appreciated, and if you can point out a fundamental assumption I'm getting wrong, even more so. Choosing among video cards was so much simpler; I feel like I'm back in highschool, lost in chemistry or something equally arcane. One real frustration is that the numbers on these chips that are being recommend don't seem to be that much different than my old 2.66Ghz dual core; which means I can't even tell the difference between chips that are separated by two years and who knows how many generations. Am I just looking at entirely the wrong set of numbers?